The Relative Effects of Business-to-Business (vs. Business-to-Consumer) Service Innovations on Firm Value and Firm Risk: An Empirical Analysis

被引:64
作者
Dotzel, Thomas [1 ]
Shankar, Venkatesh [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Mkt, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Mkt, Mays Business Sch, Mkt, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
B2B marketing; finance-marketing interface; innovation; machine learning; natural language processing; services; shareholder value; strategy; PRODUCT INTRODUCTIONS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; INSIGHTS; CAPABILITIES; STRATEGIES; RETURNS; IMPACT; SALES;
D O I
10.1177/0022242919847221
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many firms introduce both business-to-business service innovations (B2B-SIs) and business-to-consumer service innovations (B2C-SIs) and need to better allocate their resources. However, they are unsure about B2B-Sls' effects on firm value or risk, especially relative to those of B2C-SIs. The authors address this problem by developing hypotheses that relate the number of B2B-Sls and B2C-Sls to firm value and firm risk together with the moderators (the number of product innovations and customer-focus innovations). To test the hypotheses, the authors develop and estimate a model using unique panel data of 2,263 Sls across 15 industries over eight years assembled from multiple data sources and controlling for firm- and market-specific factors, heterogeneity, and endogeneity. They analyze innovation announcements using natural language processing. The results show that B2B-SIs have a positive effect on firm value and an insignificant influence on firm risk. Importantly, the effect of a B2B-SI on firm value is significantly greater than that of a B2C-SI. Unlike B2C-SIs, the effect of B2B-SIs on firm value is greater when the firm has more product innovations. Surprisingly, unlike B2C-SIs, the effect of B2B-SIs on firm value is less positive when the SIs emphasize customers. These findings offer important insights about the relative value of B2B-SIs.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 152
页数:20
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [31] Lance Bettencourt, 2010, SERVICE INNOVATION G
  • [32] Modeling Heterogeneity in the Satisfaction, Loyalty Intention, and Shareholder Value Linkage: A Cross-Industry Analysis at the Customer and Firm Levels
    Lariviere, Bart
    Keiningham, Timothy L.
    Aksoy, Lerzan
    Yalcin, Atakan
    Morgeson, Forrest V., III
    Mithas, Sunil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2016, 53 (01) : 91 - 109
  • [33] Multichannel Strategies for Managing the Profitability of Business-to-Business Customers
    Lawrence, Justin M.
    Crecelius, Andrew T.
    Scheer, Lisa K.
    Patil, Ashutosh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2019, 56 (03) : 479 - 497
  • [34] Strategic responses to new technologies and their impact on firm performance
    Lee, RP
    Grewal, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2004, 68 (04) : 157 - 171
  • [35] Lilien Gary L., 2006, MARKETING ENG
  • [36] Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value
    Luo, Xueming
    Bhattacharya, C. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2006, 70 (04) : 1 - 18
  • [37] New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration
    Menor, LJ
    Tatikonda, MV
    Sampson, SE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2002, 20 (02) : 135 - 157
  • [38] Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: An investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies
    Meuter, ML
    Bitner, MJ
    Ostrom, AL
    Brown, SW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (02) : 61 - 83
  • [39] Pricing hybrid bundles by understanding the drivers of willingness to pay
    Meyer, Jeffrey
    Shankar, Venkatesh
    Berry, Leonard L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2018, 46 (03) : 497 - 515
  • [40] Meyer MH, 2001, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V18, P188