Agroforestry for biodiversity conservation of nature reserves:: functional group identification and analysis

被引:33
作者
Huang, W
Luukkanen, O
Johanson, S
Kaarakka, V
Räisänen, S
Vihemäki, H
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Ecol, Trop Forestry Unit, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Forest & Pk Serv, Nat Heritage Serv, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
analytic hierarchy process; distinctness index; functional group; human disturbance; nature reserves; Usambara mountains;
D O I
10.1023/A:1020284225155
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agroforestry, as one of integrated approaches to biodiversity conservation, has received attention. But the methods to evaluate this contribution are rare. The present study focuses on the method development for quantification of effects of agroforestry on biodiversity conservation. It includes identifying the functional groups of agroforestry components, defined as a set of species with similar impacts on a system process, and quantifying the distinctness of these groups, as related to wise use of resources and increasing well-being of local people. Combining with functional group-based Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis, the present work gives a useful way for an integrated evaluation-planning of agroforestry management relative to biodiversity conservation. It also provides a means to improve our knowledge on the potential roles of agroforestry in biodiversity conservation of nature reserves. The analyses, using the distinctness index of functional groups, demonstrated the impacts of various land-use systems on biodiversity conservation. The analyses, using AHP, ranked the priorities of various agroforestry and plantations on the protection of nature forests, aiming at the long-term solution for the resource support. The present study suggests that agroforestry development for biodiversity conservation should take into account the impacts of functional groups in strategic planning.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Huang WD, 1997, AMBIO, V26, P394
[12]   Modelling the coexistence gain and interactions of populations in Taxodium ascendens-intercrop systems [J].
Huang, WD .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1998, 107 (2-3) :189-212
[13]  
*ICRAF, 1997, ICRAF MED TERM PLAN
[14]  
JOHANSSON S, 1996, FACTS FIGURES E USAM
[15]   Operationalization of biological diversity as a decision objective in tactical forest planning [J].
Kangas, J ;
Pukkala, T .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1996, 26 (01) :103-111
[16]   MANAGING BIODIVERSITY IN A FORESTRY ENVIRONMENT [J].
KUUSIPALO, J ;
KANGAS, J .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 8 (02) :450-460
[17]   Linking biodiversity and ecosystem function: An introduction [J].
Lacroix, G ;
Abbadie, L .
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1998, 19 (03) :189-193
[18]   The domestication and commercialization of indigenous trees in agroforestry for the alleviation of poverty [J].
Leakey, RRB ;
Simons, AJ .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 1997, 38 (1-3) :165-176
[19]   DISTANCE BETWEEN SETS [J].
LEVANDOWSKY, M ;
WINTER, D .
NATURE, 1971, 234 (5323) :34-+
[20]   Forests as human-dominated ecosystems [J].
Noble, IR ;
Dirzo, R .
SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5325) :522-525