Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications

被引:630
作者
Seto, Karen C. [1 ]
Davis, Steven J. [2 ]
Mitchell, Ronald B. [3 ,4 ]
Stokes, Eleanor C. [1 ]
Unruh, Gregory [5 ]
Urge-Vorsatz, Diana [6 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Oregon, Dept Polit Sci, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[4] Univ Oregon, Environm Studies Program, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[5] George Mason Univ, New Century Coll, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[6] Cent European Univ, Ctr Climate Change & Sustainable Energy Policy, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 41 | 2016年 / 41卷
关键词
climate change; positive feedback loops; path dependency; fossil fuels; energy; TRAVEL CHOICE INERTIA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENERGY BUILDINGS; PATH DEPENDENCE; RISK-AVERSION; CO2; EMISSIONS; BEHAVIOR; HABIT; TRANSPORT; POWER;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Existing technologies, institutions, and behavioral norms together act to constrain the rate and magnitude of carbon emissions reductions in the coming decades. The inertia of carbon emissions due to such mutually reinforcing physical, economic, and social constraints is referred to as carbon lock-in. Carbon lock-in is a special case of path dependency, which is common in the evolution of complex systems. However, carbon lock-in is particularly prone to entrenchment given the large capital costs, long infrastructure lifetimes, and interrelationships between the socioeconomic and technical systems involved. Further, the urgency of efforts to avoid dangerous climate change exacerbates the liability of even small lock-in risks. Although carbon lock-in has been recognized for years, efforts to characterize the types and causes of carbon lock-in, or to quantitatively assess and evaluate its policy implications, have been limited and scattered across a number of different disciplines. This systematic review of the literature synthesizes what is known about the types and causes of carbon lock-in, including the scale, magnitude, and longevity of the effects, and policy implications. We identify three main types of carbon lock-in and describe how they coevolve: (a) infrastructural and technological, (b) institutional, and (c) behavioral. Although each type of lock-in has its own set of processes, all three are tightly intertwined and contribute to the inertia of carbon emissions. We outline the conditions, opportunities, and strategies for fostering transitions toward less-carbon-intensive emissions trajectories. We conclude by proposing a carbon lock-in research agenda that can help bridge the gaps between science, knowledge, and policy-making.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 452
页数:28
相关论文
共 136 条
[61]   Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants [J].
Johnson, Nils ;
Krey, Volker ;
McCollum, David L. ;
Rao, Shilpa ;
Riahi, Keywan ;
Rogelj, Joeri .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 90 :89-102
[62]   Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts [J].
Johnstone, Nick ;
Hascic, Ivan ;
Popp, David .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2010, 45 (01) :133-155
[63]  
Kammen DM, 2006, SCI AM, V295, P84
[64]  
Kingdon J.W., 2014, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, V2
[65]  
Kingdon John W., 1984, AGENDAS ALTERNATIVES
[66]   The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: The case of energy for road transport [J].
Klitkou, Antje ;
Bolwig, Simon ;
Hansen, Teis ;
Wessberg, Nina .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2015, 16 :22-37
[67]   A comprehensive action determination model Toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice [J].
Klockner, Christian A. ;
Blobaum, Anke .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 30 (04) :574-586
[68]   Fundamental irreversibilities in stock externalities [J].
Kolstad, CD .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1996, 60 (02) :221-233
[69]   Prospective voluntary agreements for escaping techno-institutional lock-in [J].
Könnölä, T ;
Unruh, GC ;
Carrillo-Hermosilla, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (02) :239-252
[70]   No quick switch to low-carbon energy [J].
Kramer, Gert Jan ;
Haigh, Martin .
NATURE, 2009, 462 (7273) :568-569