Emergent Constraints in Climate Projections: A Case Study of Changes in High-Latitude Temperature Variability

被引:27
作者
Borodina, Aleksandra [1 ]
Fischer, Erich M. [1 ]
Knutti, Reto [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
SEA-ICE LOSS; OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS; ARCTIC AMPLIFICATION; PRECIPITATION EXTREMES; INTERNAL VARIABILITY; VERTICAL STRUCTURE; FUTURE CHANGES; SENSITIVITY; CIRCULATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0662.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Climate projections from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) ensemble show a decrease in interannual surface temperature variability over high latitudes with a large intermodel spread, in particular over the areas of sea ice retreat. Here relationships are found between the models' present-day performance in sea ice-related metrics and future changes in temperature variability. These relations, so-called emergent constraints, can produce ensembles of models calibrated with present-day observations with a narrower spread across their members than across the full ensemble. The underlying assumption is that models in better agreement with observations or reanalyses in a carefully selected metric probably have a more realistic representation of local processes, and therefore are more reliable for projections. Thus, the reliability of this method depends on the availability of high-quality observations or reanalyses. This work represents a step toward formalization of the emergent constraints framework, as so far there is no consensus on how the constraints should be best implemented. The authors quantify the reduction in spread from emerging constraints for various metrics and their combinations, different emission scenarios, and seasons. Some of the general features of emerging constraints are discussed, and how to effectively aggregate information across metrics and seasons to achieve the largest reduction in model spread. It is demonstrated, based on the case of temperature variability, that a robust constraint can be obtained by combining relevant metrics across all seasons. Such a constraint results in a strongly reduced spread across model projections, which is consistent with a process understanding of variability changes due to sea ice retreat.
引用
收藏
页码:3655 / 3670
页数:16
相关论文
共 102 条
[21]   The Role of Ocean-Atmosphere Coupling in the Zonal-Mean Atmospheric Response to Arctic Sea Ice Loss [J].
Deser, Clara ;
Tomas, Robert A. ;
Sun, Lantao .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2015, 28 (06) :2168-2186
[22]   Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability [J].
Deser, Clara ;
Phillips, Adam ;
Bourdette, Vincent ;
Teng, Haiyan .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2012, 38 (3-4) :527-546
[23]   The Seasonal Atmospheric Response to Projected Arctic Sea Ice Loss in the Late Twenty-First Century [J].
Deser, Clara ;
Tomas, Robert ;
Alexander, Michael ;
Lawrence, David .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2010, 23 (02) :333-351
[24]   Land-atmosphere coupling associated with snow cover [J].
Dutra, Emanuel ;
Schaer, Christoph ;
Viterbo, Pedro ;
Miranda, Pedro M. A. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 38
[25]   A Less Cloudy Future: The Role of Subtropical Subsidence in Climate Sensitivity [J].
Fasullo, John T. ;
Trenberth, Kevin E. .
SCIENCE, 2012, 338 (6108) :792-794
[26]   Changes in European summer temperature variability revisited [J].
Fischer, E. M. ;
Rajczak, J. ;
Schaer, C. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 39
[27]   Future changes in daily summer temperature variability: driving processes and role for temperature extremes [J].
Fischer, Erich M. ;
Schaer, Christoph .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2009, 33 (7-8) :917-935
[28]  
Flato G, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P741
[29]   Evidence for a wavier jet stream in response to rapid Arctic warming [J].
Francis, Jennifer A. ;
Vavrus, Stephen J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 10 (01)
[30]   Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes [J].
Francis, Jennifer A. ;
Vavrus, Stephen J. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 39