Inference-Based Ambiguity Management in Decentralized Decision-Making: Decentralized Diagnosis of Discrete-Event Systems

被引:43
作者
Kumar, Ratnesh [1 ]
Takai, Shigemasa [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Osaka Univ, Div Elect Elect & Informat Engn, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ambiguity; decentralized diagnosis; discrete-event systems (DESs); inference-diagnosability; inferencing; knowledge; FAULT-DIAGNOSIS; DISTRIBUTED DIAGNOSIS; FAILURE DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSABILITY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1109/TASE.2009.2021330
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The task of decentralized decision-making involves interaction of a set of local decision-makers, each of which operates under limited sensing capabilities and is thus subjected to ambiguity during the process of decision-making. In our prior work, we made a key observation that such ambiguities are of differing gradations and presented a framework for inferencing over varying ambiguity levels to arrive at local and global control decisions. We develop a similar framework for performing diagnosis in a decentralized setting. For each event-trace executed by a system being monitored, each local diagnoser issues its own diagnosis decision (failure or nonfailure or unsure), tagged with a certain ambiguity level (zero being the minimum). A global diagnosis decision is taken to be a "winning" local diagnosis decision, i.e., one with a minimum ambiguity level. The computation of an ambiguity level for a local decision requires an assessment of the self-ambiguity as well as the ambiguities of the others, and an inference based up on such knowledge. In order to characterize the class of systems for which any fault can be detected within a uniformly bounded number of steps (or "delay"), we introduce the notion of N-inference-diagnosability for Failures (also called N-inference F-diagnosability), where the index N represents the maximum ambiguity level of any winning local decision. We show that the F-codiagnosability introduced in [19] is the same as 0-inference F-diagnosability; the conditional F-codiagnosability introduced in [341, [35] is a type of 1-inference F-diagnosability; the class of higher-index inference F-diagnosable systems strictly subsumes the class of lower-index ones; and the class of inference F-diagnosable systems is strictly subsumed by the class of systems that are centrally F-diagnosable. Note to Practitioners-This paper studies the problem of decentralized failure diagnosis in discrete event systems. This is relevant for diagnosis of large scale distributed systems such as communication networks, manufacturing systems, and power systems. Multiple decision-makers observe the behaviors of an underlying system using their own set of sensors, and jointly diagnose the occurrence of a failure based on their observations of the system behavior together with an inference of the self-ambiguity and those of the others. Each diagnosis decision of a decision-maker is tagged with an ambiguity level, and an overall diagnosis decision is taken to be a diagnosis decision with a minimum ambiguity level. A notion of N-inference F-diagnosability is introduced as a condition under which each failure is diagnosed within a bounded number of steps (or "delay") of its occurrence by one of the decision-makers, and the ambiguity levels of all winning decisions are upper bounded by N. Properties of N-inference F-diagnosable system and specification pairs are studied and an algorithm for verifying the property of N-inference F-diagnosability is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 491
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Boel RK, 2002, WODES'02: SIXTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DISCRETE EVENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, P175, DOI 10.1109/WODES.2002.1167685
[2]  
Bouyer P, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3441, P219
[3]   Diagnosis of intermittent faults [J].
Contant, O ;
Lafortune, S ;
Teneketzis, D .
DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2004, 14 (02) :171-202
[4]   Characterizing a confidence space for discrete event timings for fault monitoring using discrete sensing and actuation signals [J].
Das, SR ;
Holloway, LE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2000, 30 (01) :52-66
[5]   Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems [J].
Debouk, R ;
Lafortune, S ;
Teneketzis, D .
DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 10 (1-2) :33-86
[6]  
HASHTRUDI S, 2003, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, V48, P1199
[7]  
Holloway LE, 1996, INTEGR COMPUT-AID E, V3, P244
[8]  
Jiang AM, 2006, CMC-COMPUT MATER CON, V3, P1
[9]  
JIANG S, 2006, P 25 AM CONTR C MINN, P6051
[10]   Failure diagnosis of discrete-event systems with linear-time temporal logic specifications [J].
Jiang, SB ;
Kumar, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2004, 49 (06) :934-945