Psychometric testing of the self-care of heart failure index

被引:272
作者
Riegel, B
Carlson, B
Moser, DK
Sebern, M
Hicks, FD
Roland, V
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Sharp Healthcare, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Coll Nursing, Lexington, KY USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Nursing, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[6] Rush Univ, Coll Nursing, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[7] Covenant HealthCare, Saginaw, MI USA
关键词
self-care; heart failure; instrument; outcomes research; naturalistic decision-making; treatment compliance;
D O I
10.1016/j.cardfail.2003.12.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Self-care is believed to improve outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. However, research testing this assumption is hampered by difficulties in measuring self-care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a revised instrument measuring self-care in persons with HF, the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI). The SCHFI is a self-report measure comprised of 15 items rated on a 4-point response scale and divided into 3 subscales. Methods and Results: Psychometric testing was done using data from 760 HF patients (age 70.36 +/- 12.3 years, 51% male) from 7 sites in the United States. Reliability of the SCHFI (alpha .76) was adequate. Reliability of the Self-Care Maintenance subscale was lower than desired (alpha .56) but the reliability of the other subscales was adequate: Self-Care Management (alpha .70) and Self-Care Self-Confidence (alpha .82). Construct validity was supported with satisfactory model fit on confirmatory factor analysis (NFI = .69, CFI .73). Construct validity was supported further with significant total and subscale (all P < .05) differences between patients experienced with HF and those newly diagnosed, consistent with the underlying theory. Conclusion: Low reliability of the Self-Care Maintenance subscale was expected because the items reflect behaviors known to vary in individuals. The reliability and validity of the SCHFI are sufficient to support its use in clinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 360
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]  
Dodd M J, 1993, Oncol Nurs Forum, V20, P895
[12]  
FRANCQUEFRONTIE.L, 2002, CLIN EXCELL NURSE PR, V6, P23
[13]   PATIENT EDUCATION NEEDS AS REPORTED BY CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE PATIENTS AND THEIR NURSES [J].
HAGENHOFF, BD ;
FEUTZ, C ;
CONN, VS ;
SAGEHORN, KK ;
MORANVILLEHUNZIKER, MB .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1994, 19 (04) :685-690
[14]  
Helmstadter G. C., 1964, PRINCIPLES PSYCHOL M
[15]   Development and testing of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale [J].
Jaarsma, T ;
Strömberg, A ;
Mårtensson, J ;
Dracup, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2003, 5 (03) :363-370
[16]   MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
SINGER, J ;
GUYATT, GH .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04) :407-415
[17]  
JONES EG, 1992, NURS RES, V41, P186
[18]   Focus article: Taking stock of naturalistic decision making [J].
Lipshitz, R ;
Klein, G ;
Orasanu, J ;
Salas, E .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2001, 14 (05) :331-352
[19]   Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms [J].
Lorig, KR ;
Holman, HR .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2003, 26 (01) :1-7
[20]  
Nanevicz R, 2000, CONGEST HEART FAILUR, V6, P140