Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search

被引:21
作者
Thomas, Laura E. [1 ]
Lleras, Alejandro [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ATTENTIONAL CONTROL SETTINGS; RAPID RESUMPTION; RETURN; TASK;
D O I
10.3758/APP.71.6.1241
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Inhibition of return facilitates visual search, biasing attention away from previously examined locations. Prior research has shown that, as a result of inhibitory tags associated with rejected distractor items, observers are slower to detect small probes presented at these tagged locations than they are to detect probes presented at locations that were unoccupied during visual search, but only when the search stimuli remain visible during the probe-detection task. Using an interrupted visual search task, in which search displays alternated with blank displays, we found that inhibitory tagging occurred in the absence of the search array when probes were presented during these blank displays. Furthermore, by manipulating participants' attentional set, we showed that these inhibitory tags were associated only with items that the participants actively searched. Finally, by probing before the search was completed, we also showed that, early in search, processing at distractor locations was actually facilitated, and only as the search progressed did evidence for inhibitory tagging arise at those locations. These results suggest that the context of a visual search determines the presence or absence of inhibitory tagging, as well as demonstrating for the first time the temporal dynamics of location prioritization while search is ongoing.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1250
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   INHIBITION OF RETURN - EFFECTS OF ATTENTIONAL CUEING ON EYE-MOVEMENT LATENCIES [J].
ABRAMS, RA ;
DOBKIN, RS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1994, 20 (03) :467-477
[2]  
Breitmeyer B.G., 1984, Visual Masking: An integrative approach
[3]   Novelty Is Not Always the Best Policy: Inhibition of Return and Facilitation of Return as a Function of Visual Task [J].
Dodd, Michael D. ;
Van der Stigchel, Stefan ;
Hollingworth, Andrew .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (03) :333-339
[4]   EFFECTS OF FOREPERIOD, FOREPERIOD VARIABILITY, AND PROBABILITY OF STIMULUS OCCURRENCE ON SIMPLE REACTION-TIME [J].
DRAZIN, DH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 62 (01) :43-&
[5]   Inhibition of return and attentional control settings [J].
Gibson, BS ;
Amelio, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2000, 62 (03) :496-504
[6]   INHIBITORY TAGGING SYSTEM FACILITATES VISUAL-SEARCH [J].
KLEIN, R .
NATURE, 1988, 334 (6181) :430-431
[7]  
Klein Raymond M., 1994, P113
[8]   Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search [J].
Klein, RM ;
MacInnes, WJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (04) :346-352
[9]   Rapid resumption of interrupted visual search [J].
Lleras, A ;
Rensink, RA ;
Enns, JT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (09) :684-688
[10]   Consequences of display changes during interrupted visual search: Rapid resumption is target specific [J].
Lleras, Alejandro ;
Rensink, Ronald A. ;
Enns, James T. .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2007, 69 (06) :980-993