Novelty Is Not Always the Best Policy: Inhibition of Return and Facilitation of Return as a Function of Visual Task

被引:64
作者
Dodd, Michael D. [1 ]
Van der Stigchel, Stefan [2 ]
Hollingworth, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Psychol, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Univ Utrecht, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
LONG-TERM INHIBITION; FORAGING FACILITATOR; SEARCH; MEMORY; ATTENTION; ALLOCATION; COMPONENTS; LOCATIONS; PARADIGM;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02294.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We report a study that examined whether inhibition of return (IOR) is specific to visual search or a general characteristic of visual behavior. Participants were shown a series of scenes and were asked to (a) search each scene for a target, (b) memorize each scene, (c) rate how pleasant each scene was, or (d) view each scene freely. An examination of saccadic reaction times to probes provided evidence of IOR during search: Participants were slower to look at probes at previously fixated locations than to look at probes at novel locations. For the other three conditions, however, the opposite pattern of results was observed: Participants were faster to look at probes at previously fixated locations than to look at probes at novel locations, a facilitation-of-return effect that has not been reported previously. These results demonstrate that IOR is a search-specific strategy and not a general characteristic of visual attention.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 339
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm [J].
Danziger, S ;
Kingstone, A ;
Snyder, JJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (05) :1467-1475
[2]   Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: Implications for memory and visual search [J].
Dodd, MD ;
Castel, AD ;
Pratt, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (07) :1126-1135
[3]   The effect of previous trial type on inhibition of return [J].
Dodd, Michael D. ;
Pratt, Jay .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2007, 71 (04) :411-417
[4]   Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search [J].
Gilchrist, ID ;
Harvey, M .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (19) :1209-1212
[5]   The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing [J].
Henderson, JM ;
Weeks, PA ;
Hollingworth, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1999, 25 (01) :210-228
[6]   Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays [J].
Hollingworth, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2007, 33 (01) :31-47
[7]   Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing [J].
Hooge, ITC ;
Over, EAB ;
van Wezel, RJA ;
Frens, MA .
VISION RESEARCH, 2005, 45 (14) :1901-1908
[8]   Visual search has no memory [J].
Horowitz, TS ;
Wolfe, JM .
NATURE, 1998, 394 (6693) :575-577
[9]   Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? [J].
Horowitz, TS ;
Wolfe, JM .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2003, 10 (03) :257-298
[10]   Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search [J].
Horowitz, TS ;
Wolfe, JM .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2001, 63 (02) :272-285