Pebble abrasion during fluvial transport: Experimental results and implications for the evolution of the sediment load along rivers

被引:138
作者
Attal, Mikael [1 ]
Lave, Jerome [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Drummond St, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Ctr Rech Petrog & Geochim, F-54501 Nancy, France
关键词
GRAVEL-BED RIVERS; BEDROCK INCISION; GRAIN-SIZE; DOWNSTREAM; EROSION; WIDTH; SALTATION; PROFILES; CHANNELS; HIMALAYA;
D O I
10.1029/2009JF001328
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In actively eroding landscapes, fluvial abrasion modifies the characteristics of the sediment carried by rivers and consequently has a direct impact on the ability of mountain rivers to erode their bedrock and on the characteristics and volume of the sediment exported from upland catchments. In this experimental study, we use a novel flume replicating hydrodynamic conditions prevailing in mountain rivers to investigate the role played by different controlling variables on pebble abrasion during fluvial transport. Lithology controls abrasion rates and processes, with differences in abrasion rates exceeding two orders of magnitude. Attrition as well as breaking and splitting are efficient processes in reducing particle size. Mass loss by attrition increases with particle velocity but is weakly dependent on particle size. Fragment production is enhanced by the use of large particles, high impact velocities and the presence of joints. Based on our experimental results, we extrapolate a preliminary generic relationship between pebble attrition rate and transport stage (T*/T-c*), where T* = fluvial Shields stress and T-c* = critical Shields stress for incipient pebble motion. This relationship predicts that attrition rates are independent of transport stage for (T*/T* c) <= 3 and increase linearly with transport stage beyond this value. We evaluate the extent to which abrasion rates control downstream fining in several different natural settings. A simplified model predicts that the most resistant lithologies control bed load flux and fining ratio and that the concavity of transport-limited river profiles should rarely exceed 0.25 in the absence of deposition and sorting.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 65 条
[51]  
SHAW J, 1982, B ALBERTA GEOL SURV, V41
[52]  
Sklar L, 1998, GEOPH MONOG SERIES, V107, P237
[53]   Do gravel bed river size distributions record channel network structure? [J].
Sklar, Leonard S. ;
Dietrich, William E. ;
Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi ;
Lashermes, Bruno ;
Bellugi, Dino .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (06)
[54]   A mechanistic model for river incision into bedrock by saltating bed load [J].
Sklar, LS ;
Dietrich, WE .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2004, 40 (06) :W063011-W0630121
[55]  
Sklar LS, 2001, GEOLOGY, V29, P1087, DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<1087:SARSCO>2.0.CO
[56]  
2
[57]  
Sternberg H., 1875, Z F R BAUWESEN, V25, P483
[59]   Erosion and exhumation in the Himalaya from cosmogenic isotope inventories of river sediments [J].
Vance, D ;
Bickle, M ;
Ivy-Ochs, S ;
Kubik, PW .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2003, 206 (3-4) :273-288
[60]   A laboratory and field study of cobble abrasion [J].
Wentworth, CK .
JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY, 1919, 27 (07) :507-521