The impact of autonomy and task uncertainty on team performance: A longitudinal field study

被引:131
作者
Cordery, John L. [1 ]
Morrison, David [2 ]
Wright, Brett M. [3 ]
Wall, Toby D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, UWA Business Sch, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] St George Bank, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sheffield, Inst Work Psychol, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
WORK GROUPS; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; SELF-MANAGEMENT; DESIGN-FEATURES; CONSEQUENCES; ORGANIZATIONS; ANTECEDENTS; EMPOWERMENT; PRINCIPLES; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1002/job.657
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we seek to account for modest and inconsistent empirical support for a positive relationship between team autonomy and team performance by proposing that team task uncertainty impacts on team performance and moderates the impact of increased autonomy. Task uncertainty is defined in terms of a team's lack of prior knowledge about which operational problems will arise when, and the best way of dealing with them. Results from a longitudinal field Study of 17 wastewater treatment teams showed that higher levels of task uncertainty were initially associated with reduced performance, assessed in terms of the quality of treated effluent produced by the teams. An intervention designed to enhance team autonomy led to general improvements in team performance, though moderated by team task uncertainty. Under conditions of enhanced team autonomy, a positive relationship emerged between task uncertainty and team performance. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 258
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DESIGN OF JOBS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1958, Hawthorne Revisited
[3]  
*AUSTR WAT RES COU, 1988, GUID EV WAST TREATM
[4]   Impact of work teams on manufacturing performance: A longitudinal field study [J].
Banker, RD ;
Field, JM ;
Schroeder, RG ;
Sinha, KK .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (04) :867-890
[5]   Work organization, technology, and performance in customer service and sales [J].
Batt, R .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1999, 52 (04) :539-564
[6]  
Bryk A. S., 1992, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
[7]   RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS [J].
CAMPION, MA ;
MEDSKER, GJ ;
HIGGS, AC .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 46 (04) :823-850
[8]   PRINCIPLES OF SOCIOTECHNICAL DESIGN [J].
CHERNS, A .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1976, 29 (08) :783-792
[9]   Sociotechnical principles for system design [J].
Clegg, CW .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2000, 31 (05) :463-477
[10]   What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite [J].
Cohen, SG ;
Bailey, DE .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1997, 23 (03) :239-290