Measuring health care quality: Comparing and contrasting the medical and the marketing approaches

被引:34
作者
Bowers, MR
Kiefe, CI
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Business, Chair Management Mkt & Ind Distribut, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Ctr Outcomes & Effectiveness Res & Educ, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
consumer satisfaction; health care quality; marketing; outcomes of care; patient satisfaction; processes of care;
D O I
10.1177/106286060201700403
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Health care quality, a key concept for medical practice and research, is also a widely used construct in health care administration and marketing research. We explored discipline-specific differences in the definition of quality, with the intent of finding a more unified approach. We summarized definitions and basic conceptual approaches to quality in both disciplines and then compared them on several attributes: basic goals, sources of measurement, role of patient perceptions, role of health care personnel, and need for risk adjustment. We developed a conceptual model combining the 2 approaches. Both disciplines could benefit from broadening their outcome measures. Patient satisfaction deserves more attention from medical researchers, whereas marketing approaches should go beyond using patient satisfaction as the only outcome of interest. It is conceptually feasible to integrate medical and marketing approaches to quality, with important insights resulting from this integration.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 144
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Consumer surveys of health plan performance: A comparison of content and approach and a look to the future [J].
Allen, HM ;
Rogers, WH .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1996, 22 (12) :775-794
[2]   CUSTOMER SATISFACTION, MARKET SHARE, AND PROFITABILITY - FINDINGS FROM SWEDEN [J].
ANDERSON, EW ;
FORNELL, C ;
LEHMANN, DR .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1994, 58 (03) :53-66
[3]  
BABAKUS E, 1992, HEALTH SERV RES, V26, P767
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICIAN COMMUNICATIONS SKILLS ON PATIENT SATISFACTION - RECALL, AND ADHERENCE [J].
BARTLETT, EE ;
GRAYSON, M ;
BARKER, R ;
LEVINE, DM ;
GOLDEN, A ;
LIBBER, S .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1984, 37 (9-10) :755-764
[5]  
Bentley J M, 1998, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, V24, P40
[6]  
BERWICK DM, 1987, THEORY PRACTICE MEAS
[7]   Quality of care .1. What is it? [J].
Blumenthal, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (12) :891-894
[8]   WHAT ATTRIBUTES DETERMINE QUALITY AND SATISFACTION WITH HEALTH-CARE-DELIVERY [J].
BOWERS, MR ;
SWAN, JE ;
KOEHLER, WF .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (04) :49-55
[9]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[10]   The urgent need to improve health care quality - Institute of medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality [J].
Chassin, MR ;
Galvin, RW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :1000-1005