Estimation of the number of decomposition levels for a wavelet-based multi-resolution multisensor image fusion

被引:184
作者
Pradhan, Pushkar S. [1 ]
King, Roger L.
Younan, Nicolas H.
Holcomb, Derrold W.
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39759 USA
[2] Leica Geosyst, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2006年 / 44卷 / 12期
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
image fusion; multiresolution; multispectral(MS); pan-sharpening; shift invariant; wavelet transform;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2006.881758
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The wavelet-based scheme for the fusion of multispectral (MS) and panchromatic (PAN) imagery has become quite popular due to its ability to preserve the spectral fidelity of the MS imagery while improving its spatial quality. This is important if the resultant imagery is used for automatic classification. Wavelet-based fusion results depend on the number of decomposition levels applied in the wavelet transform. Too-few decomposition levels result in poor spatial quality fused images. On the other hand, too many levels reduce the spectral similarity between the original MS and the pan-sharpened images. If the shift-invariant wavelet transform is applied, each excessive decomposition level results in a large computational penalty. Thus, the choice of the number of decomposition levels is significant. In this paper, PAN and MS image pairs with different resolution ratios were fused using the shift-invariant wavelet transform, and the optimal decomposition levels were determined for each resolution ratio. In general, it can be said that the fusion of images with larger resolution ratios requires a higher number of decomposition levels. This paper provides the practitioner an understanding of the tradeoffs associated with the computational demand and the spatial and spectral quality of the wavelet-based fusion algorithm as a function of the number of decomposition levels.
引用
收藏
页码:3674 / 3686
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Multispectral image sharpening using a shift-invariant wavelet transform and adaptive processing of multiresolution edges [J].
Lemeshewsky, GP .
VISUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING XI, 2002, 4736 :189-200
[12]   Multispectral multisensor image fusion using wavelet transforms [J].
Lemeshewsky, GP .
VISUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING VIII, 1999, 3716 :214-222
[13]  
MALLAT S, 1989, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V11, P7
[14]   Multiresolution-based image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition [J].
Núñez, J ;
Otazu, X ;
Fors, O ;
Prades, A ;
Palà, V ;
Arbiol, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 37 (03) :1204-1211
[15]   Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications [J].
Pohl, C ;
van Genderen, JL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1998, 19 (05) :823-854
[16]   Image fusion - the ARSIS concept and some successful implementation schemes [J].
Ranchin, T ;
Aiazzi, B ;
Alparone, L ;
Baronti, S ;
Wald, L .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 58 (1-2) :4-18
[17]   Multi-band wavelet for fusing SPOT panchromatic and multispectral images [J].
Shi, WZ ;
Zhu, CQ ;
Zhu, CY ;
Yang, XM .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 69 (05) :513-520
[18]  
SMITH AR, 1978, P 5 ANN C COMP GRAPH, P12
[19]  
Strang G., 1996, Wavelets and filter banks
[20]  
Wald L, 1997, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V63, P691