Treatment of shigellosis .5. Comparison of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin - A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

被引:125
作者
Khan, WA
Seas, C
Dhar, U
Salam, MA
Bennish, ML
机构
[1] TUFTS UNIV NEW ENGLAND MED CTR, BOSTON, MA 02111 USA
[2] INT CTR DIARRHOEAL DIS RES, DHAKA 1000, BANGLADESH
[3] UNIV PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA, INST MED TROP ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT, LIMA, PERU
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-126-9-199705010-00004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Treatment of shigellosis is currently limited by the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains of Shigella. Objective: To determine the efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of shigellosis. Design: Randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Setting: Diarrhea treatment center in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Patients: 70 men with shigellosis that had lasted 72 hours or less. Interventions: Patients stayed in the hospital for 6 days. Thirty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive 500 mg of azithromycin on study day 1, followed by 250 mg once daily for 4 days; 36 patients were assigned to receive 500 mg of ciprofloxacin every 12 hours for 5 days. Measurements: Clinical treatment failure was considered to have occurred if frank dysentery persisted for 72 hours after therapy began or if on study day 5 a patient had more than six stools, had any bloody-mucoid stools, had more than one watery stool, or had an oral body temperature exceeding 37.8 degrees C. Bacteriologic treatment failure was considered to have occurred if Shigella strains could be isolated from a stool sample after study day 2. Therapy was considered either clinically or bacteriologically successful in patients who completed therapy and did not meet criteria for failure. Results: Therapy was clinically successful in 28 (82%) patients who received azithromycin and 32 (89%) patients who received ciprofloxacin (difference, -7% [95% CI, -23% to 10%]). Therapy was bacteriologically successful in 32 (94%) patients receiving azithromycin and 36 (100%) patients receiving ciprofloxacin (difference. -6% [CI, -14% to 2%]). Peak serum concentrations of azithromycin were equal to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIG) of the infecting Shigella strains, whereas serum concentrations of ciprofloxacin were 28 times the MIG. Stool concentrations of both drugs were more than 200 times the MIG. Conclusion: Azithromycin is effective in the treatment of moderate to severe shigellosis caused by multidrug-resistant Shigella strains.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 703
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SINGLE-DOSE AZITHROMYCIN IN TREATMENT OF TRACHOMA [J].
BAILEY, RL ;
ARULLENDRAN, P ;
WHITTLE, HC ;
MABEY, DCW .
LANCET, 1993, 342 (8869) :453-456
[2]   SHORT-COURSE NORFLOXACIN AND TRIMETHOPRIM-SULFAMETHOXAZOLE TREATMENT OF SHIGELLOSIS AND SALMONELLOSIS IN EGYPT [J].
BASSILY, S ;
HYAMS, KC ;
ELMASRY, NA ;
FARID, Z ;
CROSS, E ;
BOURGEOIS, AL ;
AYAD, E ;
HIBBS, RG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1994, 51 (02) :219-223
[3]  
BELLAMY C, 1997, STATE WORLDS CHILDRE, V80
[4]  
Bennish Michael L., 1995, P1499
[5]   THERAPY FOR SHIGELLOSIS .2. RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF CIPROFLOXACIN AND AMPICILLIN [J].
BENNISH, ML ;
SALAM, MA ;
HAIDER, R ;
BARZA, M .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1990, 162 (03) :711-716
[6]   TREATMENT OF SHIGELLOSIS .3. COMPARISON OF ONE-DOSE OR 2-DOSE CIPROFLOXACIN WITH STANDARD 5-DAY THERAPY - A RANDOMIZED, BLINDED TRIAL [J].
BENNISH, ML ;
SALAM, MA ;
KHAN, WA ;
KHAN, AM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 117 (09) :727-734
[7]   ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE OF SHIGELLA ISOLATES IN BANGLADESH, 1983-1990 - INCREASING FREQUENCY OF STRAINS MULTIPLY RESISTANT TO AMPICILLIN, TRIMETHOPRIM-SULFAMETHOXAZOLE, AND NALIDIXIC-ACID [J].
BENNISH, ML ;
SALAM, MA ;
HOSSAIN, MA ;
MYAUX, J ;
KHAN, EH ;
CHAKRABORTY, J ;
HENRY, F ;
RONSMANS, C .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1992, 14 (05) :1055-1060
[8]  
BENNISH ML, 1991, REV INFECT DIS, V13, pS245
[9]   RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF NORFLOXACIN FOR SHIGELLOSIS [J].
BHATTACHARYA, SK ;
BHATTACHARYA, MK ;
DUTTA, P ;
SEN, D ;
RASAILY, R ;
MOITRA, A ;
PAL, SC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1991, 45 (06) :683-687
[10]   TREATMENT OF BACILLARY DYSENTERY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN ENOXACIN AND NALIDIXIC-ACID [J].
DEMOL, P ;
METS, T ;
LAGASSE, R ;
VANDEPITTE, J ;
MUTWEWINGABO, A ;
BUTZLER, JP .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 19 (05) :695-698