Chemistry of arsenic in soils: I. Sorption of arsenate and arsenite by four Australian soils

被引:159
作者
Smith, E
Naidu, R
Alston, AM
机构
[1] CRC Soil & Land Management, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Dept Soil Sci, CRC Soil & Land Management, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia
[3] CSIRO Land & Water, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800060005x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ten soils varying widely in chemistry and mineralogy were used to examine the physical and chemical properties that influence As sorption processes in soils. The sorption of As was measured using a batch technique with As-V and As-III concentrations added in background solutions of NaNO3 (0.00-0.3 mol L-1) and a range of pH values (2.0-8.5). The soils generally sorbed more As-V than As-III at equivalent As concentrations. In general, highly oxidic soils sorbed three times more As-V than soils containing small amounts of oxidic minerals. The effect of pH on As sorption varied considerably among the soils. In soils with low concentrations of oxidic minerals, increasing pH had little affect on the amount of As-V sorbed while in highly oxidic soils, sorption of As-V decreased with increasing pH. This decrease was attributed to two interacting factors, the increasing negative surface potential on the plane of sorption and increasing amount of negatively charged As-V species present in soil solution. In contrast to As', sorption of As-III increased with increasing pH. The effect of ionic strength on As sorption varied bet between the As species. In general, there was a pH (similar to 3) below which As-V sorption decreased with increasing ionic strength and above which the reverse occurred. For As-III species, increasing ionic strength had little effect on the amount of As sorbed.
引用
收藏
页码:1719 / 1726
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ALLISON JD, 1990, MINTEQA2 PRODEFA GEO
[2]   ARSENATE ADSORPTION ON AMORPHOUS ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE [J].
ANDERSON, MA ;
FERGUSON, JF ;
GAVIS, J .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1976, 54 (03) :391-399
[3]   DESCRIBING THE EFFECTS OF ELECTROLYTE ON ADSORPTION OF PHOSPHATE BY A VARIABLE CHARGE SURFACE [J].
BARROW, NJ ;
BOWDEN, JW ;
POSNER, AM ;
QUIRK, JP .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1980, 18 (04) :395-404
[4]  
Blakemore L.C., 1987, 80 DEP SCI IND RES
[5]   IONIC-STRENGTH EFFECTS ON SURFACE-CHARGE AND ADSORPTION OF PHOSPHATE AND SULFATE BY SOILS [J].
BOLAN, NS ;
SYERS, JK ;
TILLMAN, RW .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1986, 37 (03) :379-388
[6]   SORPTION OF ARSENIC BY IRON-OXIDES AND OXYHYDROXIDES IN SOILS [J].
BOWELL, RJ .
APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 9 (03) :279-286
[7]   SPECIATION OF ARSENIC IN A CONTAMINATED SOIL BY SOLVENT-EXTRACTION [J].
CHAPPELL, J ;
CHISWELL, B ;
OLSZOWY, H .
TALANTA, 1995, 42 (03) :323-329
[8]   ARSENIC SOLUBILITY IN A REDUCED ENVIRONMENT [J].
DEUEL, LE ;
SWOBODA, AR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1972, 36 (02) :276-&
[9]   ARSENITE SORPTION AND DESORPTION IN SOILS [J].
ELKHATIB, EA ;
BENNETT, OL ;
WRIGHT, RJ .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1984, 48 (05) :1025-1030
[10]   Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite .1. Surface structure [J].
Fendorf, S ;
Eick, MJ ;
Grossl, P ;
Sparks, DL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (02) :315-320