A two-year prospective analysis of trunk function in TRAM breast reconstructions

被引:32
作者
Alderman, Amy K.
Kuzon, William M., Jr.
Wilkins, Edwin G.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sect Plast Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Ann Arbor Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Vet Affairs Ctr Practice Management & Outcomes Re, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.prs.0000218176.40705.5a
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Functional outcomes in breast reconstruction are important quality measures and aid in patients' decision-making process. To address the concerns of abdominal wall morbidity with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions, the authors prospectively evaluated the long-term effects of postmastectomy breast reconstruction on trunk function using objective clinical measures. Methods: Using a multicenter prospective cohort design, they recruited women undergoing first-time immediate or delayed breast reconstructions from 12 centers and 23 plastic surgeons. Trunk functional data, objectively measured with Cybex machines, for patients with an expander/implant, pedicle TRAM, and free TRAM reconstructions were evaluated preoperatively and at postoperative years 1 and 2 in 183 patients. The effects of procedure type, timing, and laterality on trunk peak torque and range of motion were analyzed using linear regression. Results: At 2 years postoperatively, procedure type, timing, and laterality did not significantly affect the range of motion for trunk flexion and extension. Peak torque for trunk flexion at year 2 was significantly decreased in patients with TRAM compared with expander/implant reconstructions (p < 0.05), with a 6 to 19 percent decrease in flexion peak torque. However, no significant difference in flexion peak torque was found between patients with free and pedicle TRAM reconstructions. Conclusions: The authors found that (1) breast cancer patients with TRAM reconstructions had a less than 20 percent long-term deficit in trunk flexion peak torque and (2) there was no significant difference in trunk function between patients receiving pedicle and free TRAM reconstructions.
引用
收藏
页码:2131 / 2138
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction [J].
Alderman, AK ;
Wilkins, EG ;
Lowery, JC ;
Kim, M ;
Davis, JA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (04) :769-776
[2]   The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction [J].
Blondeel, PN ;
Vanderstraeten, GG ;
Monstrey, SJ ;
VanLanduyt, K ;
Tonnard, P ;
Lysens, R ;
Boeckx, WD ;
Matton, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 50 (05) :322-330
[3]   A prospective and randomized study, "SVEA," comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result [J].
Brandberg, Y ;
Malm, M ;
Blomqvist, L .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (01) :66-74
[4]   Evaluation of abdominal wall strength after TRAM flap surgery [J].
Dulin, WA ;
Avila, RA ;
Verheyden, CN ;
Grossman, L .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (06) :1662-1665
[5]   PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MASTECTOMY [J].
EBERLEIN, TJ ;
CRESPO, LD ;
SMITH, BL ;
HERGRUETER, CA ;
DOUVILLE, L ;
ERIKSSON, E .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (01) :29-36
[6]   BREAST RECONSTRUCTION - PROGRESS IN THE PAST DECADE [J].
ELLIOTT, LF ;
HARTRAMPF, CR .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 14 (06) :763-775
[7]  
GROTTING JC, 1994, CLIN PLAST SURG, V21, P207
[8]   Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: Experience with the first 50 flaps [J].
Hamdi, M ;
Weiler-Mithoff, EM ;
Webster, MHC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 103 (01) :86-95
[9]   The deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap for breast reconstruction [J].
Keller, A .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2001, 46 (05) :474-479
[10]   Abdominal-wall recovery following TRAM flap: A functional outcome study [J].
Kind, GM ;
Rademaker, AW ;
Mustoe, TA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 99 (02) :417-428