Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology

被引:323
作者
Wang, G
Huang, SH [1 ]
Dismukes, JP
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Intelligent CAM Syst Lab, Dept Mech Ind & Nucl Engn, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Ctr Mfg Value Chain Sci, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
supply chain; analytic hierarchy process; product life cycle; SCOR model;
D O I
10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00221-4
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Effective supply chain design calls for robust analytical models and design tools. Previous works in this area are mostly Operation Research oriented without considering manufacturing aspects. Recently, researchers have begun to realize that the decision and integration effort in supply chain design should be driven by the manufactured product, specifically, product characteristics and product life cycle. In addition, decision-making processes should be guided by a comprehensive set of performance metrics. In this paper, we relate product characteristics to supply chain strategy and adopt supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model level I performance metrics as the decision criteria. An integrated analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and preemptive goal programming (PGP) based multi-criteria decision-making methodology is then developed to take into account both qualitative and quantitative factors in supplier selection. While the AHP process matches product characteristics with supplier characteristics (using supplier ratings derived from pairwise comparisons) to qualitatively determine supply chain strategy, PGP mathematically determines the optimal order quantity from the chosen suppliers. Since PGP uses AHP ratings as input, the variations of pairwise comparisons in AHP will influence the final order quantity. Therefore, users of this methodology should put greater emphasis on the AHP progress to ensure the accuracy of supplier ratings. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[41]  
Rao Tummala V. M., 1996, INT J QUALITY RELIAB, V13, P8, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656719610114371
[42]   The plant location problem: New models and research prospects [J].
Revelle, CS ;
Laporte, G .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1996, 44 (06) :864-874
[43]   VENDOR SELECTION WITH BUNDLING [J].
ROSENTHAL, EC ;
ZYDIAK, JL ;
CHAUDHRY, SS .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1995, 26 (01) :35-48
[44]  
Saaty T.L., 1982, DECISION MAKING LEAD
[46]  
Saaty TL., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation
[47]  
*SCC, 1999, OV SCOR MOD V2 0
[48]   Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costing [J].
Schniederjans, MJ ;
Garvin, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 100 (01) :72-80
[49]  
Sharma D., 1989, Proceedings of the 1989 Annual Conference of the Decision Sciences Institute, P1088
[50]   IMPACT OF ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE TECHNOLOGY ON JIT SHIPMENTS [J].
SRINIVASAN, K ;
KEKRE, S ;
MUKHOPADHYAY, T .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1994, 40 (10) :1291-1304