Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis

被引:839
作者
Helton, J. C.
Johnson, J. D.
Sallaberry, C. J.
Storlie, C. B.
机构
[1] Sandia Natl Labs, Dept 6849, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] ProStat, Mesa, AZ 85204 USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Dept Stat, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
aleatory uncertainty; epistemic uncertainty; Latin hypercube sampling; Monte Carlo; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.017
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis are reviewed. The following topics are considered: (i) definition of probability distributions to characterize epistemic uncertainty in analysis inputs, (ii) generation of samples from uncertain analysis inputs, (iii) propagation of sampled inputs through an analysis, (iv) presentation of uncertainty analysis results, and (v) determination of sensitivity analysis results. Special attention is given to the determination of sensitivity analysis results, with brief descriptions and illustrations given for the following procedures/techniques: examination of scatterplots, correlation analysis, regression analysis, partial correlation analysis, rank transformations, statistical tests for patterns based on gridding, entropy tests for patterns based on gridding, nonparametric regression analysis, squared rank differences/rank correlation coefficient test, two-dimensional Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, tests for patterns based on distance measures, top down coefficient of concordance, and variance decomposition. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1209
页数:35
相关论文
共 211 条
[81]  
Helton JC, 2003, RADIOACTIV ENVIRONM, V4, P353
[82]   Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty [J].
Helton, JC ;
Oberkampf, WL .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 85 (1-3) :1-10
[83]   UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR USE IN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FOR RADIOACTIVE-WASTE DISPOSAL [J].
HELTON, JC .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1993, 42 (2-3) :327-367
[84]   TREATMENT OF UNCERTAINTY IN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS FOR COMPLEX-SYSTEMS [J].
HELTON, JC .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (04) :483-511
[85]   Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems [J].
Helton, JC ;
Davis, FJ .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2003, 81 (01) :23-69
[86]  
HELTON JC, 2002, SAND20010417 SAND NA
[87]  
HELTON JC, 2000, SAND992240 SAND NAT
[88]  
HELTON JC, 1998, SAND980365 SAND NAT
[89]   Sensitivity analysis in the context of uncertainty analysis for computationally intensive models [J].
Hofer, E .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 117 (1-2) :21-34
[90]   PROPAGATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN RISK ASSESSMENTS - THE NEED TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN UNCERTAINTY DUE TO LACK OF KNOWLEDGE AND UNCERTAINTY DUE TO VARIABILITY [J].
HOFFMAN, FO ;
HAMMONDS, JS .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (05) :707-712