Do promotions benefit manufacturers, retailers, or both?

被引:181
作者
Srinivasan, S [1 ]
Pauwels, K
Hanssens, DM
Dekimpe, MG
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, A Gary Anderson Grad Sch Management, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Tuck Sch Business, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Mkt Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Catholic Univ Louvain, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
long-term profitability; sales promotions; category management; manufacturers versus retailers; empirical generalizations; vector autoregressive models;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1040.0225
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Do price promotions generate additional revenue and for whom? Which brand, category, and market conditions influence promotional benefits and their allocation across manufacturers and retailers? To answer these questions, we conduct a large-scale econometric investigation of the effects of price promotions on manufacturer revenues, retailer revenues, and total profits (margins). A first major finding is that a price promotion typically does not have permanent monetary effects for either party. Second, price promotions have a predominantly positive impact on manufacturer revenues, but their effects on retailer revenues are mixed. Moreover, retailer category margins are typically reduced by price promotions. Even when accounting for cross-category and store-traffic effects, we still find evidence that price promotions are typically not beneficial to the retailer. Third, our results indicate that manufacturer revenue elasticities are higher for promotions of small-share brands, for frequently promoted brands and for national brands in impulse product categories with a low degree of brand proliferation and low private-label shares. Retailer revenue elasticities are higher for brands with frequent and shallow promotions, for impulse products, and in categories with a low degree of brand proliferation. Finally, retailer margin elasticities are higher for promotions of small-share brands and for brands with infrequent and shallow promotions. We discuss the managerial implications of our results for both manufacturers and retailers.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 629
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Market response to a major policy change in the marketing mix: Learning from Procter & Gamble's value pricing strategy [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Lehmann, DR ;
Neslin, SA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2001, 65 (01) :44-61
[2]   Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: Store brands versus national brand promotions [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Neslin, SA ;
Gedenk, K .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2001, 65 (01) :71-89
[3]   The retail power-performance conundrum: What have we learned? [J].
Ailawadi, KL .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2001, 77 (03) :299-318
[4]   THE RATIONAL EFFECT OF PRICE PROMOTIONS ON SALES AND CONSUMPTION [J].
ASSUNCAO, JL ;
MEYER, RJ .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (05) :517-535
[5]   The decomposition of promotional response: An empirical generalization [J].
Bell, DR ;
Chiang, JW ;
Padmanabhan, V .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (04) :504-526
[6]  
BESANKO D, 2004, IN PRESS MARKETING S
[7]   HOW PROMOTIONS WORK [J].
BLATTBERG, RC ;
BRIESCH, R ;
FOX, EJ .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1995, 14 (03) :G122-G132
[8]   Slotting allowances and fees: Schools of thought and the views of practicing managers [J].
Bloom, PN ;
Gundlach, GT ;
Cannon, JP .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2000, 64 (02) :92-108
[9]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MARKET CHARACTERISTICS AND PROMOTIONAL PRICE ELASTICITIES [J].
BOLTON, RN .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1989, 8 (02) :153-169
[10]   The emergence of market structure in new repeat-purchase categories: The interplay of market share and retailer distribution [J].
Bronnenberg, BJ ;
Mahajan, V ;
Wilfried, R ;
Vanhonacker, WR .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2000, 37 (01) :16-31