Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: A meta-analysis

被引:656
作者
Chiba, N
DeGara, CJ
Wilkinson, JM
Hunt, RH
机构
[1] MCMASTER UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT MED,DIV GASTROENTEROL,HAMILTON,ON L8N 3Z5,CANADA
[2] SURREY GI CLIN,GUELPH,ON,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/gast.1997.v112.pm9178669
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Esophagitis healing proportions ave often incorrectly called the healing rate. The aim of this study was to compare different drug classes by expressing the speed of healing and symptom relief through a new approach, Methods: A fully recursive literature search to July 1996 identified 43 articles on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (7635 patients) meeting strict inclusion criteria: single- or double-blind randomized studies in adults with endoscopically proven erosive or ulcerative esophagitis, For each drug class, linear regression analysis estimated the average percentage of patients who were healed and heartburn free per week, Results: Mean overall healing proportion irrespective of drug dose or treatment duration (less than or equal to 12 weeks) was highest with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 83.6% +/- 11.4%) vs. H-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs; 51.9% +/- 17.1%), sucralfate (39.2% +/- 22.4%), or placebo (28.2% +/- 15.6%), Correcting for patients without baseline heartburn, the mean heartburn-free proportion was highest with PPIs (77.4% +/- 10.4%) vs. H2RAs (47.6% +/- 15.5%), PPIs showed a significantly faster healing rate (11.7%/wk) vs, H2RAs (5.9%/wk) and placebo (2.9%/wk). PPIs provided faster, more complete heartburn relief (11.5%/wk) vs. H2RAs (6.4%/wk). Conclusions: Move complete esophagitis healing and heartburn relief is observed with PPIs vs. H2RAs and occurs nearly twice as fast, This semiquantitative expression of speed of healing and symptom relief permits comparisons for future economic evaluation and quality-of-life assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:1798 / 1810
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] NIZATIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - AN ITALIAN MULTICENTER STUDY
    BALDI, F
    LONGANESI, A
    FERRARINI, F
    MORSELLILABATE, AM
    VOI, M
    CAMARRI, F
    PORRO, GB
    TITTOBELLO, A
    DOBRILLA, G
    ANGELINI, G
    CELLE, G
    MAZZEO, F
    BEDOGNI, V
    MATTIOLI, S
    ANGELETTI, CA
    CORAZZIARI, E
    CIPOLLETTA, L
    SABBATINI, F
    FAMILIARI, F
    FERRAU, O
    PUSTORINO, S
    LICATA, A
    RUSSO, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 1993, 5 (06) : 475 - 478
  • [2] BARDHAN KD, 1995, ALIMENT PHARM THER, V9, P15
  • [3] BARDHAN KD, 1995, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V9, P145
  • [4] COMPARISON OF OMEPRAZOLE AND CIMETIDINE IN REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - SYMPTOMATIC, ENDOSCOPIC, AND HISTOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS
    BATE, CM
    KEELING, PWN
    OMORAIN, C
    WILKINSON, SP
    FOSTER, DN
    MOUNTFORD, RA
    TEMPERLEY, JM
    HARVEY, RF
    THOMPSON, DG
    DAVIS, M
    FORGACS, IC
    BASSETT, KS
    RICHARDSON, PDI
    [J]. GUT, 1990, 31 (09) : 968 - 972
  • [5] BATE CM, 1993, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V7, P501
  • [6] APPROPRIATE ACID SUPPRESSION FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE
    BELL, NJV
    BURGET, D
    HOWDEN, CW
    WILKINSON, J
    HUNT, RH
    [J]. DIGESTION, 1992, 51 : 59 - 67
  • [7] ROLE OF GASTRIC-ACID SUPPRESSION IN THE TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE
    BELL, NJV
    HUNT, RH
    [J]. GUT, 1992, 33 (01) : 118 - 124
  • [8] REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS THERAPY - SUCRALFATE VERSUS RANITIDINE IN A DOUBLE-BLIND MULTICENTER TRIAL
    BREMNER, CG
    MARKS, IN
    SEGAL, I
    SIMJEE, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 91 : S119 - S122
  • [9] CASTELL DO, 1985, PATHOGENESIS DIAGNOS, P3
  • [10] CHIBA N, 1993, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V88, P1486