Phase retrieval, error reduction algorithm, and Fienup variants: a view from convex optimization

被引:427
作者
Bauschke, HH [1 ]
Combettes, PL
Luke, DR
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Math & Stat, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Paris 06, Lab Jacques Louis Lions, F-75005 Paris, France
[3] Univ Gottingen, Inst Numer & Angew Math, D-3400 Gottingen, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION | 2002年 / 19卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1364/JOSAA.19.001334
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 [光学]; 0803 [光学工程];
摘要
The phase retrieval problem is of paramount importance in various areas of applied physics and engineering. The state of the art for solving this problem in two dimensions relies heavily on the pioneering work of Gerchberg, Saxton, and Fienup. Despite the widespread use of the algorithms proposed by these three researchers, current mathematical theory cannot explain their remarkable success. Nevertheless, great insight can be gained into the behavior, the shortcomings, and the performance of these algorithms from their possible counterparts in convex optimization theory. An important step in this direction was made two decades ago when the error reduction algorithm was identified as a nonconvex alternating projection algorithm. Our purpose is to formulate the phase retrieval problem with mathematical care and to establish new connections between well-established numerical phase retrieval schemes and classical convex optimization methods. Specifically, it is shown that Fienup's basic input-output algorithm corresponds to Dykstra's algorithm and that Fienup's hybrid input-output algorithm can be viewed as an instance of the Douglas-Rachford algorithm. We provide a theoretical framework to better understand and, potentially, to improve existing phase recovery algorithms. (C) 2002 Optical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:1334 / 1345
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]
Aliprantis C., 1999, Infinite-dimensional analysis. A hitchhiker's guide, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-03961-8
[2]
[Anonymous], VECTOR SPACE PROJECT
[3]
Aubin J. P., 1990, Set-valued analysis, DOI 10.1007/978-0-8176-4848-0
[4]
BARAKAT R, 1985, J INTEGRAL EQUAT, V9, P77
[5]
ALGORITHMS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PARTIALLY KNOWN, BAND-LIMITED FOURIER-TRANSFORMS PAIRS FROM NOISY DATA [J].
BARAKAT, R ;
NEWSAM, G .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1985, 2 (11) :2027-2039
[6]
Barty A., 2001, EXP METHODS PHYS SCI, V36, P137, DOI 10.1016/S1079-4042(01)80039-4
[7]
DYKSTRA ALTERNATING PROJECTION ALGORITHM FOR 2 SETS [J].
BAUSCHKE, HH ;
BORWEIN, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATION THEORY, 1994, 79 (03) :418-443
[8]
Projection algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems [J].
Bauschke, HH ;
Borwein, JM .
SIAM REVIEW, 1996, 38 (03) :367-426
[9]
BAUSCHKE HH, 1997, RECENT DEV OPTIMIZAT, P1
[10]
BAUSCHKE HH, IN PRESS P AM MATH S