Impact of pay for performance on quality of chronic disease management by social class group in England

被引:26
作者
Crawley, Danielle [1 ]
Ng, Anthea [1 ]
Mainous, Arch G., III [2 ]
Majeed, Azeem [1 ]
Millett, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Primary Care & Social Med, London W6 8RP, England
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Family Med, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; PRIMARY-CARE; CLINICAL CARE; PRACTICE SIZE; UK QUALITY; DEPRIVATION; OUTCOMES; INDICATORS; HYPERTENSION; CASELOAD;
D O I
10.1258/jrsm.2009.080389
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To examine associations between social class and achievement of selected national audit targets for coronary heart disease (CHD), diabetes and hypertension in England before and after the introduction of a major pay for performance programme in 2004. Design Secondary analysis of 2003 and 2006 national survey data for respondents with CHD and diabetes and hypertension. Setting England. Main outcome measure Achievement of national audit targets for blood pressure, blood glucose and cholesterol control. Results There were no significant differences in achievement of blood pressure targets in individuals from manual and non-manual occupational groups with diabetes (2003: 65.9% v 60.3%, 2006: 676% v 69.7%) or hypertension (2003: 66.2% v 66.2%, 2006: 72.8% v 71.9%) before or after the introduction of pay for performance. Achievement of the cholesterol target was also similar in individuals from manual and non-manual groups with diabetes (2003: 52.5% v 46.6%, 2006: 68.7% v 70.5%) or CHD (2003: 54.3% v 53.3%, 2006: 68.6% v 71.3%). Differences in achievement of the blood pressure target in CHD [75.8% v 84.5%; AOR 0.44 (0.21-0.90)] were evident between manual and non-manual occupational groups after the introduction of pay for performance. Conclusion The quality of chronic disease management in England was broadly equitable between socioeconomic groups before this major pay for performance programme and remained so after its introduction.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 107
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? [J].
Asch, SM ;
Kerr, EA ;
Keesey, J ;
Adams, JL ;
Setodji, CM ;
Malik, S ;
McGlynn, EA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (11) :1147-1156
[2]  
Ashworth M, 2007, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V57, P441
[3]   The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: A national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004-5 [J].
Ashworth M. ;
Armstrong D. .
BMC Family Practice, 7 (1)
[4]   Will pay-for-performance and quality reporting affect health care disparities? [J].
Casalino, Lawrence P. ;
Elster, Arthur .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2007, 26 (03) :W405-W414
[5]  
Dall T., 2008, Diabetes Care, V31, P1, DOI DOI 10.2337/DC07-2052
[6]   Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework [J].
Doran, Tim ;
Fullwood, Catherine ;
Kontopantelis, Evangelos ;
Reeves, David .
LANCET, 2008, 372 (9640) :728-736
[7]   Association of deprivation, ethnicity, and sex with quality indicators for diabetes: population based survey of 53 000 patients in primary care [J].
Hippisley-Cox, J ;
O'Hanlon, S ;
Coupland, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7477) :1267-1269
[8]   Trends in socioeconomic disparities in health care quality in four countries [J].
Hussey, Peter ;
Anderson, Gerard ;
Berthelot, Jean-Marie ;
Feek, Colin ;
Kelley, Edward ;
Osborn, Robin ;
Raleigh, Veena ;
Epstein, Arnold .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 20 (01) :53-61
[9]  
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, 2001, CROSSING QUALITY CHA
[10]   The effect of the UK incentive-based contract on the management of patients with coronary heart disease in primary care [J].
McGovern, Matt P. ;
Boroujerdi, Massoud A. ;
Taylor, Michael W. ;
Williams, David J. ;
Hannaford, Philip C. ;
Lefevre, Karen E. ;
Simpson, Colin R. .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 25 (01) :33-39