Matching of critical parameters in a small non-pressurized non-humidified PEMFC stack

被引:6
作者
Chan, S. H.
Xia, Z. T.
Wei, Z. D.
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Fuel Cells Strateg Res Programme, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Chem Engn, Chongqing 630044, Peoples R China
关键词
PEMFC; critical design parameters; conductivity; air stoichiometric number;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.009
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The desired performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stack is always hindered by improper matching of critical design and operating parameters associated with the stack. This paper presents typical design considerations for a small stack, which essentially operates under non-pressurized and non-humidified conditions. With the objective of maximized energy efficiency (or fuel economy), the relationships between conductivity and water loading, water loading and relative humidity, and relative humidity and air stoichiometric number were established under different temperatures. Through these relationships, the conductivity, which is performance related, is correlated with the air stoichiometric number. Thus, the latter has become the sole control parameter for the small PEMFC stack at a fixed temperature operating under the above mentioned constraints. The results show that, under a low air stoichiometric number, the higher the operating temperature is, the higher the conductivity will be. However, opposite trend can be seen for high air stoichiometric number. For a fixed operating temperature, the conductivity drops dramatically when the air stoichiometric number exceeds the threshold value. The higher the operating temperature, the more rapid drop of the conductivity against the increased air stoichiometric number will be. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 391
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
ADAMSON AW, 1997, PHYSICAL CHEM SURFAC, P622
[2]   MATHEMATICAL-MODEL OF A GAS-DIFFUSION ELECTRODE BONDED TO A POLYMER ELECTROLYTE [J].
BERNARDI, DM ;
VERBRUGGE, MW .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1991, 37 (08) :1151-1163
[3]   Systematic parameter estimation for PEM fuel cell models [J].
Carnes, B ;
Djilali, N .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2005, 144 (01) :83-93
[4]   Analysis of a simple solid oxide fuel cell system with gas dynamic in afterburner and connecting pipes [J].
Chan, SH ;
Ho, HK ;
Ding, OL .
FUEL CELLS, 2005, 5 (01) :25-33
[5]   A mathematical model of polymer electrolyte fuel cell with anode CO kinetics [J].
Chan, SH ;
Goh, SK ;
Jiang, SP .
ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 2003, 48 (13) :1905-1919
[6]  
Chan SH, 2001, CHEM ENG TECHNOL, V24, P51, DOI 10.1002/1521-4125(200101)24:1<51::AID-CEAT51>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-I
[8]   Evaluation of planar free-breathing polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell design [J].
Hottinen, T ;
Mikkola, M ;
Lund, P .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2004, 129 (01) :68-72
[9]   Stack design and performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells [J].
Jiang, RZ ;
Chu, DR .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2001, 93 (1-2) :25-31
[10]   Effect of channel dimensions and shape in the flow-field distributor on the performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells [J].
Kumar, A ;
Reddy, RG .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2003, 113 (01) :11-18