Just how much data need to be collected for reliable bootstrap DT-MRI?

被引:17
作者
O'Gorman, Ruth L.
Jones, Derek K.
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Neuroimaging Dept, London SE5 9RS, England
[2] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Med Engn & Phys, London, England
[3] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Brain Repair & Imaging Ctr, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
bootstrap; DT-MRI; anisotropy; fiber orientation; precision; accuracy;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.21014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Diffusion tensor MRI (DT-MRI) can provide estimates of fiber orientation derived from the orientational dependence of the diffusivity of water molecules, enabling the reconstruction of white matter fiber pathways using tractography methods. However, noise arising from various sources can introduce uncertainty into the estimates of the elements of the diffusion tensor, resulting in errors in fiber orientation estimates such that tractography reconstructions of fiber pathways potentially can be imprecise and inaccurate. Recently, attempts have been made to characterize the uncertainty in DT-MRI-derived parameters using the bootstrap method; however, several questions remain open regarding the number of repeat measurements and boot-straps required to accurately and precisely reconstruct the probability distributions of the DT-MRI parameters. This study investigates the accuracy and precision of the bootstrap method for characterizing distributions of DT-MRI parameters. A number of experimental bootstrap designs and sampling schemes containing different numbers of isotropically distributed gradient vectors are considered, using an idealized system where the true variability in each parameter is known. This study demonstrates that for most DT-MRI experiments, robust results will be obtained if the minimum number of bootstraps is approximately 500, and that at least five repeat samples of each diffusion-weighted intensity should be used for bootstrapping.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 890
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Theoretical analysis of the effects of noise on diffusion tensor imaging [J].
Anderson, AW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (06) :1174-1188
[2]  
Basser PJ, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V44, P625, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:4<625::AID-MRM17>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-O
[4]   MR DIFFUSION TENSOR SPECTROSCOPY AND IMAGING [J].
BASSER, PJ ;
MATTIELLO, J ;
LEBIHAN, D .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 66 (01) :259-267
[5]   ESTIMATION OF THE EFFECTIVE SELF-DIFFUSION TENSOR FROM THE NMR SPIN-ECHO [J].
BASSER, PJ ;
MATTIELLO, J ;
LEBIHAN, D .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SERIES B, 1994, 103 (03) :247-254
[6]  
BASSER PJ, 1997, P 5 ANN M ISMRM VANC, P1740
[7]   Anisotropic noise propagation in diffusion tensor MRI sampling schemes [J].
Batchelor, PG ;
Atkinson, D ;
Hill, DLG ;
Calamante, F ;
Connelly, A .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 49 (06) :1143-1151
[8]   Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain [J].
Conturo, TE ;
Lori, NF ;
Cull, TS ;
Akbudak, E ;
Snyder, AZ ;
Shimony, JS ;
McKinstry, RC ;
Burton, H ;
Raichle, ME .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (18) :10422-10427
[9]  
Davidson A. C., 1997, BOOTSTRAP METHODS TH
[10]   1977 RIETZ LECTURE - BOOTSTRAP METHODS - ANOTHER LOOK AT THE JACKKNIFE [J].
EFRON, B .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (01) :1-26