Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: Effect on image quality

被引:110
作者
Kalra, MK
Prasad, S
Saini, S
Blake, MA
Varghese, J
Halpern, EF
Thrall, JH
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791101
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. We hypothesized that radiation doses for abdominal CT could be reduced by adjusting the dose for a patient's weight and cross-sectional abdominal dimensions, with the resultant scans still being of diagnostic quality. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Using a multidetector CT scanner, we prospectively studied 39 patients who were 65 years and older who had a known history of cancer. After performing a diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT examination, we obtained four slices each (centered at the top of the right kidney) at a standard radiation dose (240-300 mA) and at a 50% reduced dose (120-150 mA) at a constant kilovoltage of 140. Scans were obtained during a single breath-hold, with a 2.5-mm detector configuration and a slice pitch of 6:1. Reconstructed slice thickness was 5 mm. In a blinded review, two radiologists rated the randomized CT scans for overall image quality and anatomic details of liver, spleen, adrenal glands, kidneys, pancreas, and abdominal wall, using a 5-point scale (1 = unacceptable, 2 = substandard, 3 = acceptable, 4 = above average, and 5 = superior). Patients' weight and abdominal circumference, area, and anteroposterior and transverse diameters were correlated with image quality of scans obtained at standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose CT Statistical analysis of the data was performed using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. RESULTS. Overall, the image quality score was significantly higher (p < 0.005) on the scans obtained with standard-dose CT. No statistically significant difference in image quality was noted in the 50% reduced- and standard-dose CT scans in patients who weighed less than 180 lb, or 81 kg, (p > 0.05) and who had a transverse abdominal diameter of less than 34.5 cm (p > 0.05), an anteroposterior diameter of less than 28 cm. (p > 0.05), a cross-sectional circumference of less than 105 cm (p > 0.05), and a cross-sectional area of less than 800 cm(2) (p > 0.05). Good interobserver agreement (p > 0.5) was found between the two reviewing radiologists. CONCLUSION. Abdominal CT scan quality appears to be acceptable even with a 50% reduction in radiation dose except in patients with large anthropometric measurements. A reduction in CT radiation dose is possible if the tube current is optimized for the patient's weight and abdominal dimensions.
引用
收藏
页码:1101 / 1106
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BAHADOR B, 1996, TRENDS DIAGNOSTIC IM, P1
[2]  
Cohnen M, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1654
[3]   The meaning and significance of the equilibrium phase in enhanced computed tomography of the liver [J].
Dawson, P ;
Morgan, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 72 (857) :438-442
[4]   Pulmonary nodules: Experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT [J].
Diederich, S ;
Lenzen, H ;
Windmann, R ;
Puskas, Z ;
Yelbuz, TM ;
Henneken, S ;
Klaiber, T ;
Eameri, M ;
Roos, N ;
Peters, PE .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) :289-298
[5]  
Diederich S, 2000, CANCER, V89, P2483, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2483::AID-CNCR27>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-T
[7]   Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic: An effective technique for radiation dose reduction? [J].
Diel, J ;
Perlmutter, S ;
Venkataramanan, N ;
Mueller, R ;
Lane, MJ ;
Katz, DS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (05) :795-801
[8]   THE EFFECT OF MAS VARIATION UPON COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IMAGE QUALITY AS EVALUATED BY INVIVO AND INVITRO STUDIES [J].
HAAGA, JR ;
MIRALDI, F ;
MACINTYRE, W ;
LIPUMA, JP ;
BRYAN, PJ ;
WIESEN, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 138 (02) :449-454
[9]   Radiation dose management: Weighing risk versus benefit [J].
Haaga, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (02) :289-291
[10]  
Husstedt HW, 2000, J NEURORADIOLOGY, V27, P87