Prospect theory and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA)

被引:88
作者
Lahdelma, Risto [2 ]
Salminen, Pekka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Sch Business & Econ, FIN-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
[2] Univ Turku, Dept Informat Technol, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2009年 / 37卷 / 05期
关键词
Multicriteria decision making; Acceptability analysis; Prospect theory; Group decision making; Loss aversion; DECISION-MAKING; ORDINAL CRITERIA; RISKLESS CHOICE; LOSS AVERSION; SIMULATION; SUPPORT; UTILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2008.09.001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We consider problems where multiple decision makers (DMs) want to choose their most preferred alternative from a finite set based on multiple criteria. Several approaches to support DMs in such problems have been suggested. Prospect theory has appealed to researchers through its descriptive power, but rare attempts have been made to apply it to support multicriteria decision making. The basic idea of prospect theory is that alternatives are evaluated by a difference function in terms of gains and losses with respect to a reference point. The function is suggested to be concave for gains and convex for losses and steeper for losses than for gains. Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) is a family of multicriteria decision support methods that allows representing inaccurate. uncertain, or partly missing information about criteria measurements and preferences through probability distributions. SMAA methods are based on exploring the weight and criteria measurement spaces in order to describe weights that would result in a certain rank for an alternative. This paper introduces the SMAA-P method that combines the piecewise linear difference functions of prospect theory with SMAA. SMAA-P computes indices that measure how widely acceptable different alternatives are with assumed behavior. SMAA-P can be used in decision problems, where the DMs' preferences (weights, reference points and coefficients of loss aversion) are difficult to assess accurately. SMAA-P can also be used to measure how robust a decision problem is with respect to preference information. We demonstrate the method by reanalyzing a past real-life example. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 971
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]  
Gomes L., 1992, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, V16, P113
[12]  
GOMES LFA, 2009, J OPERATION IN PRESS, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.EJOR.2007.10.046
[13]   Goals as reference points [J].
Heath, C ;
Larrick, RP ;
Wu, G .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 38 (01) :79-109
[14]   Gain/loss asymmetry and riskless choice: Loss aversion in choices among job finalists [J].
Highhouse, S ;
Johnson, MA .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 68 (03) :225-233
[15]  
Jia J, 1998, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V11, P85, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199806)11:2<85::AID-BDM282>3.0.CO
[16]  
2-K
[17]   Missing consequences in multiattribute utility theory [J].
Jimenez, Antonio ;
Mateos, Alfonso ;
Rios-Insua, Sixto .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (02) :395-410
[18]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[19]  
Kangas J, 2003, FOREST SCI, V49, P928
[20]  
Keeney R. L., 1976, Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs