Nordic laboratory intercomparison of supercritical fluid extraction for the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbon, polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil

被引:30
作者
Hartonen, K
Bowadt, S
Dybdahl, HP
Nylund, K
Sporring, S
Lund, H
Oreld, F
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Chem, Analyt Chem Lab, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Danish Hydraul Inst, DK-2970 Horsholm, Denmark
[3] Stockholm Univ, ITM, Inst Appl Environm Res, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] SINTEF, Appl Chem, N-0314 Oslo, Norway
关键词
supercritical fluid extraction; total petroleum hydrocarbon; polychlorinated biphenyls; polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons;
D O I
10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00401-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Two developed supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) methods [one for the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and one for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and creosote components in soil] were evaluated in a Nordic laboratory intercomparison study with I I participating laboratories. The interlaboratory comparison showed that excellent recoveries can be obtained with SFE for PAHs and PCBs compared to the solvent extraction. For the TPH, the recoveries were significantly higher than those achieved with solvent extraction. The accuracy, expressed as the relative standard deviation, was higher than expected (generally 8-25% for PAHs, 6-20% for PCBs and less than 18% for TPH with a few very high values, especially for PCBs), but not different from the other intercomparison studies. Difference between liquid- and solid-phase collection in SFE was found to be significant only for more volatile PAH components such as naphthalene and fluorene. For PCBs and TPH, there were some variation in the results obtained with the two trapping methods. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 248
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]  
BOWADT S, 1999, ALTERNATIVE EXTRACTI
[12]  
BOWADT S, 2000, UDVIKLING ANAL BESTE
[13]   Recent extraction techniques for solid matrices-supercritical fluid extraction, pressurized fluid extraction and microwave-assisted extraction: their potential and pitfalls [J].
Camel, V .
ANALYST, 2001, 126 (07) :1182-1193
[14]   ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE USING THE RANK TRANSFORMATION [J].
CONOVER, WJ ;
IMAN, RL .
BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (03) :715-724
[15]  
DEAN JR, 1998, EXTRACTION METHODS E, P126
[16]  
DYBDAHL HP, 2000, 468 NORDT, V1
[17]  
Hartonen K, 2000, J MICROCOLUMN SEP, V12, P412, DOI 10.1002/1520-667X(2000)12:7<412::AID-MCS5>3.0.CO
[18]  
2-N
[19]   QUANTITATIVE EXTRACTION OF LINEAR ALKYLBENZENESULFONATES USING SUPERCRITICAL CARBON-DIOXIDE AND A SIMPLE DEVICE FOR ADDING MODIFIERS [J].
HAWTHORNE, SB ;
MILLER, DJ ;
WALKER, DD ;
WHITTINGTON, DE ;
MOORE, BL .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1991, 541 (1-2) :185-194
[20]   Comparisons of Soxhlet extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, supercritical fluid extraction and subcritical water extraction for environmental solids: recovery, selectivity and effects on sample matrix [J].
Hawthorne, SB ;
Grabanski, CB ;
Martin, E ;
Miller, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2000, 892 (1-2) :421-433