Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter

被引:643
作者
Scheller, Bruno [1 ]
Hehrlein, Christoph
Bocksch, Wolfgang
Rutsch, Wolfgang
Haghi, Dariush
Dietz, Ulrich
Boehm, Michael
Speck, Ulrich
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Saarlandes, Innere Med Klin 3, Homburg, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Charite, Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Heidelberg, Univ Klinikum Mannheim, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany
[5] Deutsch Klin Diagnost, D-6200 Wiesbaden, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa061254
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis is hampered by a high incidence of recurrent in-stent restenosis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of a paclitaxel-coated balloon in this setting. Methods: We enrolled 52 patients with in-stent restenosis in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial to compare the effects of a balloon catheter coated with paclitaxel (3 microg per square millimeter of balloon surface area) with those of an uncoated balloon catheter in coronary angioplasty. The primary end point was late luminal loss as seen on angiography. Secondary end points included the rates of restenosis (a binary variable) and major adverse cardiac events. Results: Multivessel disease was present in 80% of patients in both groups. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed no significant differences in baseline measures. At 6 months, angiography showed that the mean (+/-SD) in-segment late luminal loss was 0.74+/-0.86 mm in the uncoated-balloon group versus 0.03+/-0.48 mm in the coated-balloon group (P=0.002). A total of 10 of 23 patients (43%) in the uncoated-balloon group had restenosis, as compared with 1 of 22 patients (5%) in the coated-balloon group (P=0.002). At 12 months, the rate of major adverse cardiac events was 31% in the uncoated-balloon group and 4% in the coated-balloon group (P=0.01). This difference was primarily due to the need for target-lesion revascularization in six patients in the uncoated-balloon group (P=0.02). Conclusions: Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters significantly reduced the incidence of restenosis. These data suggest that the inhibition of restenosis by local drug delivery may not require stent implantation and sustained drug release at the site of injury.
引用
收藏
页码:2113 / 2124
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis [J].
Alfonso, F ;
Zueco, J ;
Cequier, A ;
Mantilla, R ;
Bethencourt, A ;
López-Minguez, JR ;
Angel, J ;
Augé, JM ;
Gómez-Recio, M ;
Morís, C ;
Seabra-Gomes, R ;
Perez-Vizcayno, MJ ;
Macaya, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (05) :796-805
[2]  
[Anonymous], ICH HARM TRIP GUID C
[3]  
Axel DI, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P636
[4]   Sirolimus-eluting stent for treatment of complex in-stent restenosis - The first clinical experience [J].
Degertekin, M ;
Regar, E ;
Tanabe, K ;
Smits, PC ;
van der Giessen, WJ ;
Carlier, SG ;
de Feyter, P ;
Vos, J ;
Foley, DP ;
Ligthart, JMR ;
Popma, JJ ;
Serruys, PW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (02) :184-189
[5]   Sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in comparison with balloon angioplasty for treatment of in-stent restenosis [J].
Iofina, E ;
Haager, PK ;
Radke, PW ;
Langenberg, R ;
Blindt, R ;
Ortlepp, J ;
Kühl, H ;
Hanrath, P ;
Hoffmann, R .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 64 (01) :28-34
[6]   Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis -: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Kastrati, A ;
Mehilli, J ;
von Beckerath, N ;
Dibra, A ;
Hausleiter, J ;
Pache, J ;
Schühlen, H ;
Schmitt, C ;
Dirschinger, J ;
Schömig, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (02) :165-171
[7]   Non-polymer-based paclitaxel-coated coronary stents for the treatment of patients with de novo coronary lesions - Angiographic follow-up of the DELIVER clinical trial [J].
Lansky, AJ ;
Costa, RA ;
Mintz, GS ;
Tsuchiya, Y ;
Midei, M ;
Cox, DA ;
O'Shaughnessy, C ;
Applegate, RA ;
Cannon, LA ;
Mooney, M ;
Farah, A ;
Tannenbaum, MA ;
Yakubov, S ;
Kereiakes, DJ ;
Wong, SC ;
Kaplan, B ;
Cristea, E ;
Stone, GW ;
Leon, MB ;
Knopf, WD ;
O'Neill, WW .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (16) :1948-1954
[8]   Clinical, angiographic, and procedural predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in complex patients - An evaluation from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) study [J].
Lemos, PA ;
Hoye, A ;
Goedhart, D ;
Arampatzis, CA ;
Saia, F ;
van der Giessen, WJ ;
McFadden, E ;
Sianos, G ;
Smits, PC ;
Hofma, SH ;
de Feyter, PJ ;
van Domburg, RT ;
Serruys, PW .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (11) :1366-1370
[9]   Robustness of late lumen loss in discriminating drug-eluting stents across variable observational and randomized trials [J].
Mauri, L ;
Orav, EJ ;
Candia, SC ;
Cutlip, DE ;
Kuntz, RE .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (18) :2833-2839
[10]   Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis - Classification and implications for long-term outcome [J].
Mehran, R ;
Dangas, G ;
Abizaid, AS ;
Mintz, GS ;
Lansky, AJ ;
Satler, LF ;
Pichard, AD ;
Kent, KM ;
Stone, GW ;
Leon, MB .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (18) :1872-1878