Results of catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter

被引:72
作者
Calkins, H
Canby, R
Weiss, R
Taylor, G
Wells, P
Chinitz, L
Milstein, S
Compton, S
Oleson, K
Sherfesee, L
Onufer, J
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Res, Austin, TX USA
[3] Riverside Methodist Hosp, Columbus, OH 43214 USA
[4] Moses Cone Mem Hosp, Greensboro, NC USA
[5] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[6] NYU, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
[7] Abbott NW Hosp, Minneapolis, MN 55407 USA
[8] Providence Alaska Med Ctr, Anchorage, AK USA
[9] Sentara Norfolk Gen Hosp, Chesapeake, VA USA
[10] Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.058
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of typical atrial flutter by using an 8-mm electrode catheter and a 100-W RF power generator. A limitation of previous trials of catheter ablation of atrial flutter is that the data were not collected as part of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. The study results associated catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter in a cohort of 150 patients with an 88% acute efficacy rate. At 6-month follow-up, recurrent typical atrial flutter was observed in 13% of patients. Of the 12 patients with typical atrial flutter recurrence, 4 were symptomatic and 8 were asymptomatic. Procedure duration was a significant predictor of typical atrial flutter recurrence. The 12-month rate for development of atrial fibrillation was 30%. Catheter ablation of atrial flutter was associated with significant improvements in 5 of 8 domains of the Short Form 36 Survey (quality of life) and significant decreases in 13 of the 16 symptoms of the Symptom Checklist. The device- or procedure-related complication rate was 2.7%. Skin burns occurred at the dispersive pad site due to stronger RF power in 3 patients. Use of a dual dispersive pad system mitigated this problem. Thus, the results of this study associated catheter ablation of atrial flutter with high acute efficacy, a small risk of recurrent atrial flutter, and an important risk of atrial fibrillation during follow-up. (C) 2004 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 442
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Recurrence of conduction following radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures: Relationship to ablation target and electrode temperature [J].
Calkins, H ;
Prystowsky, E ;
Berger, RD ;
Saul, JP ;
Klein, LS ;
Liem, LB ;
Huang, SKS ;
Gillette, P ;
Yong, P ;
Carlson, M ;
Kay, GN ;
Dailey, S ;
Epstein, A ;
Plumb, V ;
Wharton, JM ;
Kanter, R ;
Sorrentino, R ;
Greenfield, RA ;
Walsh, E ;
Waldo, A ;
Biblo, L ;
Johnson, N ;
Lieberman, R ;
Rosenbaum, D ;
Mackall, J ;
VanHare, G ;
Mittleman, RS ;
Wagshal, AB ;
Greene, T ;
Lauer, M ;
Sung, R ;
Young, C ;
Evans, J ;
Hackett, K ;
Miles, W ;
Zipes, D ;
Swartz, J ;
Lawrence, J ;
Tomaselli, G .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (08) :704-712
[2]   RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION OF THE INFERIOR VENA-CAVA - TRICUSPID-VALVE ISTHMUS IN COMMON ATRIAL-FLUTTER [J].
COSIO, FG ;
LOPEZGIL, M ;
GOICOLEA, A ;
ARRIBAS, F ;
BARROSO, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 71 (08) :705-709
[3]   Long-term outcome of patients after successful radiofrequency ablation for typical atrial flutter [J].
Gilligan, DM ;
Zakaib, JS ;
Fuller, I ;
Shepard, RK ;
Dan, D ;
Wood, MA ;
Clemo, HF ;
Stambler, BS ;
Ellenbogen, KA .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 26 (01) :53-58
[4]   Recurrent atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus: A very long-term follow-up of 333 patients [J].
Hsieh, MH ;
Tai, CT ;
Chiang, CE ;
Tsai, CF ;
Yu, WC ;
Chen, YJ ;
Ding, YA ;
Chen, SA .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 7 (03) :225-231
[5]   Prospective randomized comparison of irrigated-tip versus conventional-tip catheters for ablation of common flutter [J].
Jaïs, P ;
Shah, DC ;
Haissaguerre, M ;
Hocini, M ;
Garrigue, S ;
Le Metayer, P ;
Clémenty, J .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (07) :772-776
[6]   Effectiveness of irrigated tip catheter ablation of common atrial flutter [J].
Jaïs, P ;
Hocini, M ;
Gillet, T ;
Shah, DC ;
Haïssaguerre, M ;
Yamane, T ;
Deisenhofer, I ;
Garrigue, S ;
Le Métayer, P ;
Roudaut, R ;
Clémenty, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (04) :433-+
[7]   Comparison of effectiveness of an 8-mm versus a 4-mm tip electrode catheter for radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter [J].
Kasai, A ;
Anselme, F ;
Tee, WS ;
Cribier, A ;
Saoudi, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 86 (09) :1029-1032
[8]   Early versus late atrial fibrillation after atrial flutter ablation [J].
Loutrianakis, E ;
Barakat, T ;
Olshansky, B .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 6 (02) :173-180
[9]   THE RISK OF ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION FOLLOWING RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION OF ATRIAL-FLUTTER [J].
PHILIPPON, F ;
PLUMB, VJ ;
EPSTEIN, AE ;
KAY, GN .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (03) :430-435
[10]  
POTY H, 1995, CIRCULATION, V92, P1389