Getting even with one's supervisor and one's organization: relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors

被引:194
作者
Jones, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Sch Business Adm, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
关键词
CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; WORKPLACE AGGRESSION; MODEL; RECIPROCITY; MODERATOR; RECONCILIATION; RETALIATION;
D O I
10.1002/job.563
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
I tested hypotheses derived from the agent-system model of justice specifying that. among the different types of justice, interpersonal and informational justice explain the most unique variance in counterproductive work behavior (CWB) directed toward one's supervisor, and procedural justice explains the most unique variance in CWB directed toward one's organization. I also tested whether individuals' desires for revenge against one's supervisor and one's organization mediate certain justice-CWB relationships. Results (N=424) provided considerable support for the Study hypotheses, showing that employees tend to direct their CWB toward the source of perceived mistreatment, and that desires for revenge explain part, but not all, of the relationships between some types of injustice and CWB. Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 542
页数:18
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
Ambrose ML, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, P59
[3]   Social status and aggressiveness as moderators of the relationship between interactional justice and workplace deviance [J].
Aquino, K ;
Galperin, BL ;
Bennett, RJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 34 (05) :1001-1029
[4]   Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status [J].
Aquino, K ;
Douglas, S .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 90 (01) :195-208
[5]   How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace [J].
Aquino, K ;
Tripp, TM ;
Bies, RJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (01) :52-59
[6]  
Aquino K, 1999, J ORGAN BEHAV, V20, P1073, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199912)20:7<1073::AID-JOB943>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-7
[8]   Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations [J].
Aquino, Karl ;
Tripp, Thomas M. ;
Bies, Robert J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (03) :653-668
[9]  
Arbuckle J. L., 1997, Amos user's guide version 3.6
[10]   Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation [J].
Barclay, LJ ;
Skarlicki, DP ;
Pugh, SD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (04) :629-643