The antecedents and performance implications of cooperative exchange norms

被引:106
作者
Bercovitz, Janet
Jap, Sandy D.
Nickerson, Jack A.
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Business, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Goizueta Business Sch, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Washington Univ, John M Olin Sch Business, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
exchange norms; R&D alliances; interorganizational relationship management;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1060.0213
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Our study investigates the antecedents and performance implications of cooperative exchange norms. We argue that, in early relationships, the level of expected cooperative norms in an exchange is the result of a calculative process facilitated by transaction attributes: joint transaction-specific investments and observability. The greater the level of these two exchange attributes, the greater the level of cooperative exchange norms, all else being equal. We further argue that the realized level of cooperative exchange norms can deviate from the expected level because the development of such norms is the result of social processes that management cannot directly and fully control. This gap between realized and expected norms affects exchange performance. Performance suffers when the realized level of cooperative exchange norms falls below the expected level, but overshooting expectations lays a critical groundwork for repeat transactions. The analysis of a survey of 182 collaborative R&D alliances provides initial support for our theory.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 740
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
[61]   Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? [J].
Poppo, L ;
Zenger, T .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (08) :707-725
[62]   DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESSES OF COOPERATIVE INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS [J].
RING, PS ;
VANDEVEN, AH .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (01) :90-118
[63]   EXAMINATION OF NEED-SATISFACTION MODELS OF JOB ATTITUDES [J].
SALANCIK, GR ;
PFEFFER, J .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1977, 22 (03) :427-456
[64]   Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? [J].
Shaver, JM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (04) :571-585
[65]  
Silverman BS, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P31, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<31::AID-SMJ920>3.3.CO
[66]  
2-J
[67]  
Simon H. A., 1976, ADM BEHAV STUDY DECI
[68]   TESTS FOR COMPARING ELEMENTS OF A CORRELATION MATRIX [J].
STEIGER, JH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1980, 87 (02) :245-251
[69]   Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relationships [J].
Stump, RL ;
Heide, JB .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1996, 33 (04) :431-441
[70]   Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets [J].
Teece, DJ .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 40 (03) :55-+