The benefits of renin-angiotensin blockade in renal transplant recipients with biopsy-proven allograft nephropathy

被引:28
作者
Zaltzman, JS [1 ]
Nash, M [1 ]
Chiu, R [1 ]
Prasad, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med, Div Nephrol,Renal Transplant Program, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
关键词
allograft nephropathy; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; angiotensin receptor antagonists;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/gfg593
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Allograft nephropathy, regardless of aetiology, leads to progressive renal injury and eventual graft loss. In native kidney disease, treatment of hypertension, in particular with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), has proven beneficial in retarding renal function decline. In the present study, we reviewed the clinical course of a renal transplant recipient cohort that was prescribed either an ACEi or ARB for biopsy-proven allograft nephropathy. Methods. Patients were followed from the time of post-biopsy initiation of ACEi/ARB and were stratified based on biopsy findings. Outcomes of interest included safety, allograft survival, renal function and change in slope of renal function pre- and post-ACEi/ARB. Results. The 5 year allograft survival after biopsy diagnosis of allograft nephropathy was 83%. Serum creatinine was 191 +/- 97 (86-377) mumol/l at the time of biopsy and 228 +/- 102 (102-575) mumol/l at last follow-up. The slopes of reciprocal creatinine vs time were used to calculate the decline in renal function and were compared pre- and post-ACEi/ARB. The mean slope +/- SD was -0.06 +/- 0.21 l/mumol x 10(-3) per month in the 12 months prior to therapy and -0.03 +/- 0.09 l/mumol X 10-3 per month following therapy. The absolute difference in slopes was 0.03 (P = < 0.0001). Conclusions. Treatment with ACEi/ARB may be beneficial in the management of allograft nephropathy.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 944
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Antihypertensive drug treatment in chronic renal allograft rejection in the rat - Effect on structure and function [J].
Benediktsson, H ;
Chea, R ;
Davidoff, A ;
Paul, LC .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 62 (11) :1634-1642
[2]   Prevention of post-transplant cardiovascular disease - Report and recommendations of an ad hoc group [J].
Bostom, AD ;
Brown, RS ;
Chavers, BM ;
Coffman, TM ;
Cosio, FG ;
Culver, K ;
Curtis, JJ ;
Danovitch, GM ;
Everson, GT ;
First, MR ;
Garvey, C ;
Grimm, R ;
Hertz, MI ;
Hricik, DE ;
Hunsicker, LG ;
Ibrahim, H ;
Kasiske, BL ;
Kennedy, M ;
Klag, M ;
Knatterud, ME ;
Kobashigawa, J ;
Lake, JR ;
Light, JA ;
Matas, AJ ;
McDiarmid, SV ;
Miller, LW ;
Payne, WD ;
Rosenson, R ;
Sutherland, DER ;
Tejani, A ;
Textor, S ;
Valantine, HA ;
Wiesner, RH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (06) :491-500
[3]   Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy [J].
Brenner, BM ;
Cooper, ME ;
de Zeeuw, D ;
Keane, WF ;
Mitch, WE ;
Parving, HH ;
Remuzzi, G ;
Snapinn, SM ;
Zhang, ZX ;
Shahinfar, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (12) :861-869
[4]   PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[5]  
Halloran PF, 1999, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V10, P167
[6]   ACE inhibitor versus β-blocker for the treatment of hypertension in renal allograft recipients [J].
Hausberg, M ;
Barenbrock, M ;
Hohage, H ;
Müller, S ;
Heidenreich, S ;
Rahn, KH .
HYPERTENSION, 1999, 33 (03) :862-868
[7]  
Hausberg M, 2001, Ann Transplant, V6, P31
[8]   Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension after renal transplantation [J].
Holgado, R ;
Anaya, F ;
Del Castillo, D .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 16 :117-120
[9]  
HUNSICKER LG, 1995, KIDNEY INT, V48, pS120
[10]   Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes [J].
Lewis, EJ ;
Hunsicker, LG ;
Clarke, WR ;
Berl, T ;
Pohl, MA ;
Lewis, JB ;
Ritz, E ;
Atkins, RC ;
Rohde, R ;
Raz, I .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (12) :851-860