The influence of visual experience on the ability to form spatial mental models based on route and survey descriptions

被引:86
作者
Noordzij, Matthijs L.
Zuidhoek, Sander
Postma, Albert
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, FC Donders Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Helmholtz Inst, Psychol Lab, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
spatial language; blindness; perspective; spatial mental model;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present study is twofold: the first objective is to evaluate the importance of visual experience for the ability to form a spatial representation (spatial mental model) of fairly elaborate spatial descriptions. Secondly, we examine whether blind people exhibit the same preferences (i.e. level of performance on spatial tasks) as sighted people in processing the type of perspective that is employed in a spatial description. Early blind, late blind and sighted participants listened to a route and a survey description of two environments. Next, they had to execute a recognition/priming task. a bird flight distance comparison task, and a scale model task. Spatial priming and symbolic distance effects were found for all participants. These findings suggest that early and late blind people can form spatial mental models on the basis of route and survey descriptions. Interestingly, in contrast with sighted people, blind people performed better after listening to a route than a survey description, even when the spatial problems that has to be solved explicitly favor the survey description. It seems that people with active vision build up a spatial mental model more efficiently from a survey description. while people with only visual memories (late blind), similar to people with no visual memories (early blind). build up a spatial mental model more efficiently from a route description. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 342
页数:22
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   NONVISUAL NAVIGATION BY BLIND AND SIGHTED - ASSESSMENT OF PATH INTEGRATION ABILITY [J].
LOOMIS, JM ;
KLATZKY, RL ;
GOLLEDGE, RG ;
CICINELLI, JG ;
PELLEGRINO, JW ;
FRY, PA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1993, 122 (01) :73-91
[22]   Spatial updating of locations specified by 3-D sound and spatial language [J].
Loomis, JM ;
Lippa, Y ;
Klatzky, RL ;
Golledge, RG .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2002, 28 (02) :335-345
[23]   THE MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF SPATIAL DESCRIPTIONS [J].
MANI, K ;
JOHNSONLAIRD, PN .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1982, 10 (02) :181-187
[24]   MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS OF SPATIAL RELATIONS [J].
MCNAMARA, TP .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 18 (01) :87-121
[25]  
MILLAR S, 1994, UNDERSTANDIGN REPRES
[26]   COMPARING OBJECTS IN MEMORY - EVIDENCE SUGGESTING AN INTERNAL PSYCHOPHYSICS [J].
MOYER, RS .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1973, 13 (02) :180-184
[27]   Categorical and metric distance information in mental representations derived from route and survey descriptions [J].
Noordzij, ML ;
Postma, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2005, 69 (03) :221-232
[28]   Spatial situation models and narrative understanding: Some generalizations and extensions [J].
Rinck, M ;
Williams, P ;
Bower, GH ;
Becker, ES .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1996, 21 (01) :23-55
[29]   Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning [J].
Shelton, AL ;
McNamara, TP .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2004, 30 (01) :158-170
[30]   SPATIAL MENTAL MODELS DERIVED FROM SURVEY AND ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS [J].
TAYLOR, HA ;
TVERSKY, B .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1992, 31 (02) :261-292