Extrinsic factors and the population sizes of threatened birds

被引:24
作者
Blackburn, TM [1 ]
Gaston, KJ
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Biosci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Biodivers & Macroecol Grp, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
altitude; biogeographical region; birds; geographical range size; habitat; population size; threat;
D O I
10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00360.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Attempts to explain the orders-of-magnitude variation observed in animal population sizes have principally focused on intrinsic differences between the taxa compared, but with limited success: most variation remains unexplained by such studies. However, animal population sizes may also vary in response to extrinsic factors, such as the environment occupied or the influence of human activities. Here, we use new estimates of the global population sizes of threatened bird species to examine extrinsic correlates of variation in their numbers, using general linear modelling and methods to control for phylogenetic relatedness. Threatened bird population sizes varied significantly with several extrinsic factors, including altitude, biogeographical region inhabited, type of extinction threat faced, and habitat used. They also vary with geographical range size, which was included in the analysis to control for its potentially confounding effects on the results. Details of the observed relationships, which vary with analytical method, are discussed. However, apart from geographical range size, none of the extrinsic variables analysed here explain more than a small percentage of the variation in threatened bird population sizes. Thus, it seems likely that a comprehensive explanation for why some species are common while others are rare will not be dominated by a single factor.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 576
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   Global scale macroecology: Interactions between population size, geographic range size and body size in the Anseriformes [J].
Gaston, KJ ;
Blackburn, TM .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 65 (06) :701-714
[22]  
Harvey P. H., 1991, COMP METHOD EVOLUTIO
[23]   Species response to global environmental change or why ecophysiological models are important:: a reply to Davis et al. [J].
Hodkinson, ID .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1999, 68 (06) :1259-1262
[24]   ECOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF EXTINCTION PRONENESS IN AUSTRALIAN TROPICAL RAIN-FOREST MAMMALS [J].
LAURANCE, WF .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1991, 5 (01) :79-89
[25]  
Lawton JH., 1995, Extinction Rates
[26]   Relative risk of extinction of passerine birds on continents and islands [J].
Manne, LL ;
Brooks, TM ;
Pimm, SL .
NATURE, 1999, 399 (6733) :258-261
[27]  
McGlone M. S., 1983, ARCHAEOL OCEAN, V18, P11, DOI DOI 10.1002/ARCO.1983.18.1.11
[28]  
McLain DK, 1999, EVOL ECOL RES, V1, P549
[29]   Relationships between body size and geographical range size among Australian mammals: has human impact distorted macroecological patterns? [J].
Murray, BR ;
Dickman, CR .
ECOGRAPHY, 2000, 23 (01) :92-100
[30]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABUNDANCE AND BODY SIZE IN BRITISH BIRDS [J].
NEE, S ;
READ, AF ;
GREENWOOD, JJD ;
HARVEY, PH .
NATURE, 1991, 351 (6324) :312-313