Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses

被引:242
作者
First, MB
Pincus, HA
Levine, JB
Williams, JBW
Ustun, B
Peele, R
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Western Psychiat Inst & Clin, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Rand Corp, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] WHO, Classificat Assessment Surveys & Terminol, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[6] George Washington Univ, Dept Psychiat, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.946
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Changes in DSM-IV were guided by empirical data that mostly focused on improving diagnostic validity and reliability. Although many changes were made explicitly to improve clinical utility, no formal effort was made to empirically determine actual improvements in clinical utility. The authors propose that future revisions of DSM empirically demonstrate improvement in clinical utility to clarify whether the advantages of changing the diagnostic criteria outweigh potential negative consequences. Method: The authors provide a formal definition of clinical utility and then suggest that the merits of a proposed change to DSM be evaluated by considering 1) its impact on the use of the diagnostic system, 2) whether it enhances clinical decision making, and 3) whether it improves clinical outcome. Results: Evaluating a change based on its impact on use considers both user acceptability and accuracy in application of the diagnostic criteria. User acceptability can be measured by surveying users reactions, assessing user acceptability in a field trial setting, and measuring the effects on ease of use. Assessment of the correct application of diagnostic criteria entails comparing the clinician's diagnostic assessment to expert diagnostic assessment. Assessments of the impact on clinical decision making use methods developed for evaluating adherence to practice guidelines. Improvement in outcome entails measuring reduction in symptom severity or improvement in functioning or in documenting the prevention of a future negative outcome. Conclusions: Empirical methods should be applied to the assessment of changes that purport to improve clinical utility in future revisions of DSM.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 954
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [11] Frances A., 1995, DSM-IV guidebook
  • [12] HALES RE, 1998, DSM 4 PSYCHIAT SYSTE, P1077
  • [13] Neuroscience, genetics, and the future of psychiatric diagnosis
    Hyman, SE
    [J]. PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2002, 35 (2-3) : 139 - 144
  • [14] JAMPALA VC, 1986, AM J PSYCHIAT, V143, P148
  • [15] CONSUMERS ATTITUDES TOWARD DSM-III AND DSM-III-R - A 1989 SURVEY OF PSYCHIATRIC EDUCATORS, RESEARCHERS, PRACTITIONERS, AND SENIOR RESIDENTS
    JAMPALA, VC
    ZIMMERMAN, M
    SIERLES, FS
    TAYLOR, MA
    [J]. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 33 (03) : 180 - 185
  • [16] THE DSM-III IN CANADA - A SURVEY
    JUNEK, RW
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 1983, 28 (03): : 182 - 187
  • [17] Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses
    Kendell, R
    Jablensky, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 160 (01) : 4 - 12
  • [18] KENDLER KS, 1990, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V47, P969
  • [19] KUPFER DJ, 2002, RES AGENDA DSM 4
  • [20] LAHEY BB, 1998, DSM 4 SOURCEBOOK, V4, P661