The Dodgson ranking and the Borda count: a binary comparison

被引：11

作者：

Klamler, C ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Graz Univ, Inst Publ Econ, A-8010 Graz, Austria

来源：

MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2004年 / 48卷 / 01期

关键词：

voting paradox; voting rules; Borda rule; Dodgson rule; distance functions;

D O I：

10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2003.11.003

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

This paper provides a binary comparison of two preference aggregation rules, the Borda rule and Dodgson's rule. Both of these rules guarantee a transitive ranking of the alternatives for every list of individual preferences and therefore avoid the problem of voting cycles. It will be shown that for certain lists of individual preferences the rankings derived from the Borda rule and Dodgson's rule are antagonistic. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：103 / 108

页数：6

共 13 条

[1]

BAIGENT N, 1983, DISCUSSION PAPER SER

[2]

Borda J.C., 1781, MEMOIRE ELECTIONS SC

[3]

Debord B., 1987, MATH SCI HUMAINES, V97, P5

[4]

Dodgson C, 1876, METHOD TAKING VOTES

[5] CONDORCET SOCIAL CHOICE FUNCTIONS [J].

FISHBURN, PC .

SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1977, 33 (03) :469-489

[6]

KEMENY JG, 1959, DAEDALUS, V88, P577

[7]

KLAMLER C, 2002, IN PRESS SOCIAL CHOI

[8] CONDORCET CHOICE CORRESPONDENCES - A SET-THEORETICAL COMPARISON [J].

LAFFOND, G ;

LASLIER, JF ;

LEBRETON, M .

MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1995, 30 (01) :23-35

[9]

Laslier Jean-Francois., 1997, TOURNAMENT SOLUTIONS

[10] A comparison of Dodgson's method and the Borda count [J].

Ratliff, TC .

ECONOMIC THEORY, 2002, 20 (02) :357-372

← 1 2 →