Comparison of Virtual Unenhanced Images Derived From Dual-Energy CT With True Unenhanced Images in Evaluation of Gallstone Disease

被引:40
作者
Lee, Han A. [1 ]
Lee, Young Hwan [1 ]
Yoon, Kwon-Ha [1 ]
Bang, Dong-Ho [1 ]
Park, Dong Eun [2 ]
机构
[1] Wonkwang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Iksan 570974, South Korea
[2] Wonkwang Univ Hosp, Div Hepatobiliary Surg, Dept Surg, Iksan, South Korea
关键词
dual-energy CT; gallstone disease; true unenhanced imaging; virtual unenhanced imaging; BILE-DUCT STONES; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; NONENHANCED IMAGES; MULTIDETECTOR CT; IN-VIVO; PRINCIPLES; REPAIR;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.15.14570
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to compare gallstones on virtual unenhanced images and true unenhanced images acquired with dual-energy CT (DECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS. We enrolled 112 patients with right upper quadrant pain and clinically suspected acute cholecystitis or gallstone who underwent DECT-including unenhanced, arterial, and portal phases. Eighty-three gallstones with composition proven by semiquantitative Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy from 45 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy (40 cholesterol gallstones from 21 patients, 43 calcium gallstones from 24 patients) were included. CT images were retrospectively evaluated for stone size, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of gallstone to bile, and visibility and density of gallstones for each image set. The visibility of each type of stone was compared with a paired t test. RESULTS. Both cholesterol and calcium stones measured smaller on virtual unenhanced images than on true unenhanced images, yielding a lower sensitivity of virtual unenhanced images for detecting small gallstones. Mean CNR of cholesterol stones was 2.45 +/- 1.32 versus 1.67 +/- 1.55 (p < 0.032) and that of calcium stones was 10.59 +/- 7.15 and 14.11 +/- 9.81 (p < 0.001) for virtual unenhanced and true unenhanced images, respectively. For calcium stones, two readers found 43 of 43 (100%) on true unenhanced images; one reader found 41 of 43 (95%) and the other, 37 of 43 (86%) on virtual unenhanced images. For cholesterol stones, one reader found 20 of 40 (50%) and the other 19 of 40 (47%) on true unenhanced images versus 34 of 40 (85%) and 30 of 40 (75%), respectively, on virtual unenhanced images. The visibility of cholesterol stones was higher on virtual unenhanced images, but that of calcium stones was lower. CONCLUSION. Virtual unenhanced images at DECT allow better visualization of cholesterol gallstones, but true unenhanced images allow better visualization of calcium and small gallstones.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
CHOLELITHIASIS - EVALUATION WITH CT [J].
BARAKOS, JA ;
RALLS, PW ;
LAPIN, SA ;
JOHNSON, MB ;
RADIN, DR ;
COLLETTI, PM ;
BOSWELL, WD ;
HALLS, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (02) :415-418
[2]
Compound analysis of gallstones using dual energy computed tomography-Results in a phantom model [J].
Bauer, Ralf W. ;
Schulz, Julian R. ;
Zedler, Barbara ;
Graf, Thomas G. ;
Vogl, Thomas J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 75 (01) :E74-E80
[3]
Ultrasound and CT evaluation of emergent gallbladder pathology [J].
Bennett, GL ;
Balthazar, EJ .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 41 (06) :1203-+
[4]
Clinical Utility of Dual-Energy CT in the Evaluation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Initial Experience [J].
Chae, Eun Jin ;
Song, Jae-Woo ;
Seo, Joon Beom ;
Krauss, Bernhard ;
Jang, Yu Mi ;
Song, Koun-Sik .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 249 (02) :671-681
[5]
Gallstone detection at CT in vitro: Effect of peak voltage setting [J].
Chan, Wesley C. ;
Joe, Bonnie N. ;
Coakley, Fergus V. ;
Prien, Edwin L. ;
Gould, Robert G. ;
Prevrhal, Sven ;
Barber, William C. ;
Kirkwood, Kimberley S. ;
Qayyum, Aliya ;
Yeh, Benjamin M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) :546-553
[6]
Abdominal Aorta: Evaluation with Dual-Source Dual-Energy Multidetector CT after Endovascular Repair of Aneurysms-Initial Observations [J].
Chandarana, Hersh ;
Godoy, Myrna C. B. ;
Vlahos, Ioannis ;
Graser, Anno ;
Babb, James ;
Leidecker, Christianne ;
Macari, Michael .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 249 (02) :692-700
[7]
COOPERBERG PL, 1980, NEW ENGL J MED, V302, P1277, DOI 10.1056/NEJM198006053022303
[8]
Dual-Energy Multidetector CT: How Does It Work, What Can It Tell Us, and When Can We Use It in Abdominopelvic Imaging? [J].
Coursey, Courtney A. ;
Nelson, Rendon C. ;
Boll, Daniel T. ;
Paulson, Erik K. ;
Ho, Lisa M. ;
Neville, Amy M. ;
Marin, Daniele ;
Gupta, Rajan T. ;
Schindera, Sebastian T. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2010, 30 (04) :1037-1055
[9]
Dual energy CT (DECT) of the liver: conventional versus virtual unenhanced images [J].
De Cecco, Carlo Nicola ;
Buffa, Vitaliano ;
Fedeli, Stefano ;
Luzietti, Monica ;
Vallone, Andrea ;
Ruopoli, Roberto ;
Miele, Vittorio ;
Rengo, Marco ;
Paolantonio, Pasquale ;
Enrici, Michelangelo Maurizi ;
Laghi, Andrea ;
David, Vincenzo .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (12) :2870-2875
[10]
Dual-Energy and Dual-Source CT: Is There a Role in the Abdomen and Pelvis? [J].
Fletcher, Joel G. ;
Takahashi, Naoki ;
Hartman, Robert ;
Guimaraes, Luis ;
Huprich, James E. ;
Hough, David M. ;
Yu, Lifeng ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 47 (01) :41-+