The timed 'Up & Go' is dependent on chair type

被引:91
作者
Siggeirsdóttir, K
Jónsson, BY
Jonsson, H
Iwarsson, S
机构
[1] Iceland Heart Assoc, Res Inst, IS-201 Kopavogur, Iceland
[2] Akranes Hosp, Akranes, Iceland
[3] Landspitalinn Univ Hosp, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Lund Univ, Div Occupat Therapy, Dept Clin Neurosci, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1191/0269215502cr529oa
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction: The timed 'Up & Go' (TUG) is a performance test identifying problems in functional mobility. More knowledge on how the type of chair used influences test results is needed. Objective: To investigate inter-rater agreement on the time score and to assess if chair type used influenced the performance of the test. Setting: (1) Inter-rater agreement investigation on the time score was carried out with elderly individuals living in a retirement home (n = 31). (2) Four types of chairs were tested on elderly individuals in three different health care centres (n = 100). Results: The two observers were close in timing (mean difference = 0.04 s). From a reference chair the median time for TUG was 15.7 s compared with 16.9 s from a chair with a low seat (p < 0.001). It was significantly more difficult to stand up from a chair without armrests (p < 0.001), and from the lowest chair (p < 0.001), which was also the only chair difficult to sit down on (p = 0.02). Conclusion: The inter-rater agreement of the time scoring of the TUG has been confirmed. Test performance is dependent on chair type; chairs with armrests and a seating height of 44-47 cm should be used. Clinicians must follow standard procedures and equipment when using the test or else risk invalidating test findings.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 616
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   Economic evaluation of hospital at home versus hospital care: cost minimisation analysis of data from randomised controlled trial [J].
Jones, J ;
Wilson, A ;
Parker, H ;
Wynn, A ;
Jagger, C ;
Spiers, N ;
Parker, G .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7224) :1547-1550
[12]  
MATHIAS S, 1986, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V67, P387
[13]  
MEDLEY A, 1997, ISSUES AGING, V20, P3
[14]  
NAKAMURA DM, 1998, PHYS OCCUP THER GERI, V15, P17
[15]   Balance screening of an inner city older adult population [J].
Newton, RA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (06) :587-591
[16]   Prospective value of self-report and performance-based tests of functional status for 18-month outcomes in elderly patients [J].
Nikolaus, T ;
Bach, M ;
Oster, P ;
Schlierf, G .
AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 8 (04) :271-276
[17]  
Patton M.Q., 2001, Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.1002/NUR.4770140111
[18]   THE TIMED UP AND GO - A TEST OF BASIC FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY FOR FRAIL ELDERLY PERSONS [J].
PODSIADLO, D ;
RICHARDSON, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1991, 39 (02) :142-148
[19]   FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH FALLING IN ELDERLY HOSPITAL PATIENTS [J].
SALGADO, R ;
LORD, SR ;
PACKER, J ;
EHRLICH, F .
GERONTOLOGY, 1994, 40 (06) :325-331
[20]   The timed "up and go" test:: Reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation [J].
Schoppen, T ;
Boonstra, A ;
Groothoff, JW ;
de Vries, J ;
Göeken, LNH ;
Eisma, WH .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (07) :825-828