Effects of rotary instruments and ultrasonic irrigation on debris and smear layer scores: a scanning electron microscopic study

被引:61
作者
Mayer, BE [1 ]
Peters, OA [1 ]
Barbakow, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Div Endodontol, Dept Prevent Dent Cariol & Periodontol, CH-8028 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
debris; rotary preparation; smear layer; ultrasonic irrigation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00502.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim This study evaluated debris and smear layer scores after two types of instruments manufactured from different alloys were used to ultrasonically activate irrigants during canal preparation. The influence of two rotary preparation techniques on cleanliness of the shaped canals was also studied, Methodology Apical stops were prepared to size 45 in 42 single-canalled extracted premolars and canines which were divided into six equal groups. Groups 1, 2 and 3 were prepared by ProFile,04 (PF) while groups 4, 5 and 6 were prepared by Lightspeed (LS). All groups were irrigated using 5.25 % NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Irrigants in groups 2 and 5 were ultrasonically activated using a size 15 steel K-rile and by a blunt flexible nickel-titanium wire in groups 3 and 6. Groups 1 and 4 served as negative controls, Roots were split and canal walls examined at 15x, 200x and 400x magnification in an SEM. Smear layer and debris scores were recorded at 3.6 and 9 nun levels using a 5-step scoring scale and it 200-mum grid. Means were tested for significance using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results Debris and smear layer scores for the six groups varied from 1,98 +/- 1.04 to 3.47 +/- 0.97 and from 1.37 +/- 0.4 to 2,36 +/- 0.99 respectively. Although all groups had significantly higher smear layer and debris scores at the 3 mm levels compared to the 9 mm levels (P < 0.05), no significant differences were recorded due to the ultrasonic energy transmitted by the two alloys. Conclusion Ultrasonically activated irrigants did not reduce debris or smear layer scores. This finding was not influenced by the material nor by the design of the instrument used to transmit ultrasonic activation.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 589
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF 4 CLINICAL IRRIGATION METHODS ON THE REMOVAL OF ROOT-CANAL DEBRIS [J].
ABOURASS, M ;
PICCININO, MV .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1982, 54 (03) :323-328
[2]   ULTRASONIC DEBRIDEMENT OF ROOT CANALS - ACOUSTIC STREAMING AND ITS POSSIBLE ROLE [J].
AHMAD, M ;
FORD, TRP ;
CRUM, LA .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1987, 13 (10) :490-499
[3]  
AHMAD M, 1989, ENDOD DENT TRAUMATOL, V5, P83
[4]  
BRISENO BM, 1992, ENDOD DENT TRAUMATOL, V8, P6
[5]  
Bryant ST, 1998, INT ENDOD J, V31, P275
[6]  
Bryant ST, 1998, INT ENDOD J, V31, P282
[7]   FACTORS AFFECTING THE CLINICAL-EFFICIENCY OF ULTRASONIC ENDODONTICS - A SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY STUDY [J].
CAMERON, JA .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1995, 28 (01) :47-53
[8]   IN-VITRO CLEANING ABILITY OF ROOT-CANAL IRRIGANTS WITH AND WITHOUT ENDOSONICS [J].
CHEUNG, GSP ;
STOCK, CJR .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1993, 26 (06) :334-343
[9]  
CUNNINGHAM WT, 1982, ENDODONTOLOGY DENT T, V1, P201
[10]   AN INVITRO COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF THE STEPBACK TECHNIQUE VERSUS A STEP-BACK ULTRASONIC TECHNIQUE IN HUMAN MANDIBULAR MOLARS [J].
GOODMAN, A ;
READER, AI ;
BECK, M ;
MELFI, R ;
MEYERS, W .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1985, 11 (06) :249-256