Comparison of two hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) for in vivo bone mass measurement in the baboon (Papio ursinus)

被引:5
作者
Dal Mas, I
Biscardi, A
Ripamonti, U
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, MRC, Bone Res Unit, ZA-2193 Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Paediat Orthopaed, ZA-2193 Parktown, South Africa
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
bone densitometry; DXA system; systemic bone loss; bone mass; primates;
D O I
10.1385/JCD:5:3:313
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for bone mass measurement in humans. New generation osteodensitometers have been introduced and numerous studies have been performed to compare new and old devices for in vivo measurements of bone mineral density (BMD). However similar studies in nonhuman primates have yet to be performed. In this longitudinal study, two generation of osteodensitometers from the same manufacturer (Hologic QDR 1000 and Hologic QDR 4500/A) were used to detect bone changes in a cohort of 24 ovariectomized (OVX) Chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) during a period of 36 mo. Correlation between the same osteodensitometers were also obtained for the lumbar spine (L1-L4) area, BMD, and bone mineral content (BMC) in a cohort of 33 adult female baboons and for the total hip area, BMD, and BMC in a group of 25 adult female baboons. The QDR 1000 to QDR 4500/A area, BMC, and BMD correlation coefficient (r(2)) were 0.848, 0.939, and 0.916, respectively; r(2) for total hip BMD was 0.818. Percentage of variation (PV) among the total vertebral (L1-L4) area measured by the two osteodensitometers was 5.3 +/- 2.3 (mean +/- SD). BMC had the lowest PV and the highest r(2). The mean lumbar BMD was higher when measured by QDR 1000 with a PV% of 7.7 +/- 3.1 (mean +/- SD). The mean hip BMD was higher measured by QDR 1000 with a PV% of 9.3 +/- 7.1 (mean +/- SD). Slopes of two regression lines for the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and total hip BMD were 0.928 and 0.914, respectively. Longitudinal analysis of lumbar BMD in OVX baboons showed that QDR 4500/A detected a significant bone density increase at 36 and 48 mo post-OVX, compared to time 12, whereas the QDR 1000 did not. Our results indicate that both osteodensitometers can be used to measure bone changes in longitudinal studies in primates, but that before upgrading to a new-generation osteodensitometer, a calibration curve has to be obtained so that both devices can be equally used in regular experimental study in nonhuman primates.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 318
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   CROSS CALIBRATION OF QDR-2000 AND QDR-1000 DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY DENSITOMETERS FOR BONE-MINERAL AND SOFT-TISSUE MEASUREMENTS [J].
ABRAHAMSEN, B ;
GRAM, J ;
HANSEN, TB ;
BECKNIELSEN, H .
BONE, 1995, 16 (03) :385-390
[2]  
AUFDEMORTE TB, 1993, J BONE MINER RES, V8, pS529
[3]   Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) [J].
Barthe, N ;
Braillon, P ;
Ducassou, D ;
BasseCathalinat, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (835) :728-739
[4]   DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN FAN-BEAM AND PENCIL BEAM SCANS [J].
BLAKE, GM ;
PARKER, JC ;
BUXTON, FMA ;
FOGELMAN, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1993, 66 (790) :902-906
[5]   Replacing DXA scanners: Cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading [J].
Blake, GM .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 59 (01) :1-5
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   CROSS-CALIBRATION OF DXA EQUIPMENT - UPGRADING FROM A HOLOGIC QDR 1000/W TO A QDR-2000 [J].
FAULKNER, KG ;
GLUER, CC ;
ESTILO, M ;
GENANT, HK .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 52 (02) :79-84
[8]  
Genant HK, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P707
[9]   ACCURACY OF DUAL-ENERGY RADIOGRAPHIC ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE LUMBAR SPINE - CADAVER STUDY [J].
HO, CP ;
KIM, RW ;
SCHAFFLER, MB ;
SARTORIS, DJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) :171-173
[10]  
Hughes K. P., 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, pS209