Sensory gating in rats: Lack of correlation between auditory evoked potential gating and prepulse inhibition

被引:37
作者
Ellenbroek, BA [1 ]
van Luijtelaar, G [1 ]
Frenken, M [1 ]
Cools, AR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen, Dept Psychoneuropharmacol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
sensory gating; auditory evoked potential; acoustic startle;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033418
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
This study was designed to evaluate the possible similarities between two paradigms designed to measure sensory gating: (1) an auditory evoked potential (AEP), called the P-50 gating paradigm; and (2) an acoustic startle (ASR), called the prepulse inhibition paradigm. These paradigms show a number of methodological, pharmacological, and neurobiological similarities, and they are both disturbed in patients with schizophrenia. In the first of three experiments, the AEP gating and the ASR gating were measured in rats. Although both AEP and ASR gating could readily be obtained, there appeared to be no correlation between the performance in these two paradigms. This lack of correlation was confirmed using a factor analytical approach, where the AEP gating and the ASR gating parameters were found to load on different factors. In the second experiment, the interstimulus interval in the ASR paradigm was increased to 500 ms (identical to the interstimulus interval of the AEP gating paradigm). This increase reduced the degree of ASR gating, although some gating could still be obtained. Again no correlation was found between AEP and ASR gating, and this was again confirmed by the factorial analysis. In the final experiment, the effects of the dopamine D-2/3 agonist 7-OHDPAT were evaluated in both paradigms. This selective agonist dose dependently reduced ASR gating but had no effect on AEP gating. Together, these data strongly suggest that AEP and ASR gating measure two different aspects of information processing and indicate that both paradigms may be important for investigating the neurobiological disturbances observed in patients with psychoses.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 788
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   LOSS OF THE KAMIN BLOCKING EFFECT IN ACUTE BUT NOT CHRONIC-SCHIZOPHRENICS [J].
JONES, SH ;
GRAY, JA ;
HEMSLEY, DR .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 32 (09) :739-755
[22]  
JUDD LL, 1992, AM J PSYCHIAT, V149, P488
[23]   The acoustic startle response in rats - circuits mediating evocation, inhibition and potentiation [J].
Koch, M ;
Schnitzler, HU .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1997, 89 (1-2) :35-49
[24]  
Koch M, 1996, BEHAV NEUROSCI, V110, P468
[25]   DOPAMINERGIC STIMULATION DISRUPTS SENSORIMOTOR GATING IN THE RAT [J].
MANSBACH, RS ;
GEYER, MA ;
BRAFF, DL .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 94 (04) :507-514
[26]   EFFECTS OF PHENCYCLIDINE AND PHENCYCLIDINE BIOLOGS ON SENSORIMOTOR GATING IN THE RAT [J].
MANSBACH, RS ;
GEYER, MA .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 2 (04) :299-308
[27]   DISORDERS OF ATTENTION AND PERCEPTION IN EARLY SCHIZOPHRENIA [J].
MCGHIE, A ;
CHAPMAN, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 34 (02) :103-&
[28]  
MILLER CAF, 1995, SLEEP WAKE RES NETHE, V6, P91
[29]   THE ACTIVITY OF HIPPOCAMPAL INTERNEURONS AND PYRAMIDAL CELLS DURING THE RESPONSE OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS TO REPEATED AUDITORY-STIMULI [J].
MILLER, CL ;
FREEDMAN, R .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 69 (02) :371-381
[30]   Midlatency auditory evoked potentials and the startle response in the rat [J].
Miyazato, H ;
Skinner, RD ;
Reese, NB ;
Mukawa, J ;
GarciaRill, E .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 75 (01) :289-300