Individual differences in children's working memory and writing skill

被引:181
作者
Swanson, HL [1 ]
Berninger, VW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON, SEATTLE, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jecp.1996.0054
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research is to address (a) whether individual differences in working memory (WM) and writing are related to a general or process-specific system, (b) whether WM tasks operate independently of phonological short-term memory (STM) on measures or writing and reading, and (c) whether working memory predicts variance in writing beyond that predicted by reading alone. The present study correlated several WM and phonological STM measures with writing and reading measures. The study showed among the memory measures that a four-factor model reflecting phonological STM, verbal WM span, executive processing, and visual-spatial WM span best fit the multivariate data set. Working memory was correlated significantly with a number of writing measures, particularly those related to text generation. WM measures contributed unique variance to writing that was independent of reading skill, and STM measures best predicted transcription processes and reading recognition, whereas WM measures best predicted text generation and reading comprehension. Both verbal and visual-spatial working memory measures predicted reading comprehension, whereas only WM measures that reflect executive processing significantly predicted writing. In general, the results suggest that individual differences in children's writing reflect a specific capacity system, whereas reading comprehension draws upon a multiple capacity system. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 385
页数:28
相关论文
共 78 条
[41]   MODELS OF COGNITIVE PROCESSING - A SINGLE FLEXIBLE WORKSPACE OR A DISTRIBUTED PROCESS - COMMENT [J].
HALPERN, DF .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1990, 119 (03) :331-332
[42]  
Hayes J., 1980, COGNITIVE PROCESS, P31, DOI DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.1199633
[43]  
Hayes J.R., 1980, Cognitive processes in writing, P3, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315630274
[44]   THE COMPARISON OF ORAL AND WRITTEN PRODUCTIONS IN 2 DISCOURSE TYPES [J].
HIDI, SE ;
HILDYARD, A .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1983, 6 (02) :91-105
[45]   MEMORY FOR FAMILIAR AND UNFAMILIAR WORDS - EVIDENCE FOR A LONG-TERM-MEMORY CONTRIBUTION TO SHORT-TERM-MEMORY SPAN [J].
HULME, C ;
MAUGHAN, S ;
BROWN, GDA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1991, 30 (06) :685-701
[46]  
Jastak S., 1984, The wide range achievement test-revised
[47]  
JORESKOG KG, 1989, LISREL 7 ANAL LINEAR
[48]   A CAPACITY THEORY OF COMPREHENSION - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY [J].
JUST, MA ;
CARPENTER, PA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 99 (01) :122-149
[50]   SHORT-TERM-MEMORY DOES NOT INVOLVE THE WORKING MEMORY OF INFORMATION-PROCESSING - THE DEMISE OF A COMMON ASSUMPTION [J].
KLAPP, ST ;
MARSHBURN, EA ;
LESTER, PT .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1983, 112 (02) :240-264