3.0 Tesla contrast-enhanced mr angiography of carotid artery stents:: In vitro measurements as compared with 1.5 Tesla

被引:14
作者
Haehnel, S. [1 ]
Nguyen-Trong, T. H. [1 ]
Rohde, S. [1 ]
Hartmann, M. [1 ]
Braun, C. [1 ]
Sartor, K. [1 ]
Heiland, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Div Neuroradiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
magnetic resonance angiography; stenting; artifacts; carotid artery;
D O I
10.1016/S0150-9861(06)77234-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose: To assess the appearance of carotid artery stents at 3.0Tesla contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) as compared with 1.5Tesla. Methods: 19 stents (GUIDANT Acculink, GUIDANT Dynalink, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SMART Neuroform, GUIDANT Omnilink, EV3 Protege, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC Carotid Wallstent, ABBOTT Xact) of different materials (nitinot, stainless steal, cobalt alloy) and different sizes (4.0mm-10.0mm) were investigated regarding their appearance on CE-MRA at 3.0Tesla and at 1.5 Tesla. For each stent artificial lumen narrowing (ALN) was calculated based on a pixel-by-pixel profile of the contrast-to-noise-ratio giving an objective indicator for the size of the evaluable stent diameter. Results: Only in two stents (Omnilink 7.0mm, Omnilink 10.0mm) was ALN higher at 3.0Tesla relative to 1.5Tesla. In all other stents ALN at 3.0Tesla was the same or even lower as compared with 1.5Tesla. In contrast to the ferromagnetic stents where ALN was typically higher than 85%, in most of the nitinol stents (Acculink, Dynalink, Neuroform, Protege) ALN was below 35%. In the Xact stents ALN was generally 100% at 1.5Tesla and ranged between 31.8% and 100% at 3.0Tesla. Conclusion: CE-MRA after carotid artery stenting is considerably impaired by ALN both at 1.5Tesla and at 3.0Tesla. Nevertheless, CE-MRA is well suited for the examination of carotid artery stents made of nitinol at both field strengths. Stent manufacturers should be aware of potential artifacts caused by their stents during noninvasive diagnostic methods such as CE-MRA.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 80
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   ARTIFACTS IN MAXIMUM-INTENSITY-PROJECTION DISPLAY OF MR ANGIOGRAMS [J].
ANDERSON, CM ;
SALONER, D ;
TSURUDA, JS ;
SHAPEERO, LG ;
LEE, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (03) :623-629
[2]   SIMULATION OF SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS IN 2D AND 3D FOURIER-TRANSFORM SPIN-ECHO AND GRADIENT-ECHO MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
BAKKER, CJG ;
BHAGWANDIEN, R ;
MOERLAND, MA ;
RAMOS, LMP .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1994, 12 (05) :767-774
[3]   MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents [J].
Bartels, LW ;
Smits, HFM ;
Bakker, CJG ;
Viergever, MA .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (03) :365-371
[4]   NONSUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS DUE TO METALLIC OBJECTS IN MR-IMAGING [J].
CAMACHO, CR ;
PLEWES, DB ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 5 (01) :75-88
[5]   Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI: A step toward quantitative perfusion imaging [J].
FritzHansen, T ;
Rostrup, E ;
Larsson, HBW ;
Sondergaard, L ;
Ring, P ;
Henriksen, O .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 36 (02) :225-231
[6]  
Jost C, 1998, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V10, P477
[7]   Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR Angiography:: In vitro examination with 14 stents [J].
Lenhart, M ;
Völk, M ;
Manke, C ;
Nitz, WR ;
Strotzer, M ;
Feuerbach, S ;
Link, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (01) :173-178
[8]   Improved in-stent magnetic resonance angiography with high flip angle excitation [J].
Meyer, JMA ;
Buecker, A ;
Spuentrup, E ;
Schuermann, K ;
Huetten, M ;
Hilgers, RD ;
Van Vaals, JJ ;
Guenther, RW .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2001, 36 (11) :677-681
[9]  
Nehra A, 2004, AM J NEURORADIOL, V25, P1476
[10]   GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MR AORTOGRAPHY [J].
PRINCE, MR .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (01) :155-164