What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm?

被引:730
作者
Jefferson, KK [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Channing Lab, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
biofilm; genetics; microbial communities;
D O I
10.1016/j.femsle.2004.06.005
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Nearly 40 years ago, Dr. R.J. Gibbons made the first reports of the clinical relevance of what we now know as bacterial biofilms when he published his observations of the role of polysaccharide glycocalyx formation on teeth by Streptococcus mutans [Sci. Am. 238 (1978) 86]. As the clinical relevance of bacterial biofilm formation became increasingly apparent, interest in the phenomenon exploded. Studies are rapidly shedding light on the biomolecular pathways leading to this sessile mode of growth but many fundamental questions remain. The intent of this review is to consider the reasons why bacteria switch from a free-floating to a biofilm mode of growth. The currently available wealth of data pertaining to the molecular genetics of biofilm formation in commonly studied, clinically relevant, single-species biofilms will be discussed in an effort to decipher the motivation behind the transition from planktonic to sessile growth in the human body. Four potential incentives behind the formation of biofilms by bacteria during infection are considered: (1) protection from harmful conditions in the host (defense), (2) sequestration to a nutrient-rich area (colonization), (3) utilization of cooperative benefits (community), (4) biofilms normally grow as biofilms and planktonic cultures are an in vitro artifact (biofilms as the default mode of growth). (C) 2004 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 173
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[21]   Key role of teichoic acid net charge in Staphylococcus aureus colonization of artificial surfaces [J].
Gross, M ;
Cramton, SE ;
Götz, F ;
Peschel, A .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2001, 69 (05) :3423-3426
[22]   Toxins-antitoxins: Plasmid maintenance, programmed cell death, and cell cycle arrest [J].
Hayes, F .
SCIENCE, 2003, 301 (5639) :1496-1499
[23]  
HEILMANN C, 2003, MED IMPLICATIONS BIO, V1, P110
[24]   A putative sugar-binding transcriptional regulator in a novel gene locus in Enterococcus faecalis contributes to production of Biofilm and prolonged bacteremia in mice [J].
Hufnagel, M ;
Koch, S ;
Creti, R ;
Baldassarri, L ;
Huebner, J .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 189 (03) :420-430
[25]   A 140-kilodalton extracellular protein is essential for the accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains on surfaces [J].
Hussain, M ;
Herrmann, M ;
vonEiff, C ;
PerdreauRemington, F ;
Peters, G .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 1997, 65 (02) :519-524
[26]   Effect of an orphan response regulator on Streptococcus mutans sucrose-dependent adherence and cariogenesis [J].
Idone, V ;
Brendtro, S ;
Gillespie, R ;
Kocaj, S ;
Peterson, E ;
Rendi, M ;
Warren, W ;
Michalek, S ;
Krastel, K ;
Cvitkovitch, D ;
Spatafora, G .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2003, 71 (08) :4351-4360
[27]   The teicoplanin-associated locus regulator (TcaR) and the intercellular adhesin locus regulator (IcaR) are transcriptional inhibitors of the ica locus in Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Jefferson, KK ;
Pier, DB ;
Goldmann, DA ;
Pier, GB .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2004, 186 (08) :2449-2456
[28]   Identification of the sigB operon in Staphylococcus epidermidis:: Construction and characterization of a sigB deletion mutant [J].
Kies, S ;
Otto, M ;
Vuong, C ;
Götz, F .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2001, 69 (12) :7933-7936
[29]   Antigen 43 facilitates formation of multispecies biofilms [J].
Kjærgaard, K ;
Schembri, MA ;
Ramos, C ;
Molin, S ;
Klemm, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 2 (06) :695-702
[30]   Establishment of an arbitrary PCR for rapid identification of Tn917 insertion sites in Staphylococcus epidermidis:: Characterization of biofilm-negative and nonmucoid mutants [J].
Knobloch, JKM ;
Nedelmann, M ;
Kiel, K ;
Bartscht, K ;
Horstkotte, MA ;
Dobinsky, S ;
Rohde, H ;
Mack, D .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 69 (10) :5812-5818