Prices, capacities and service levels in a congestible Bertrand duopoly

被引:95
作者
De Borger, Bruno
Van Dender, Kurt [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Econ, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Econ, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
congestion; price capacity games; imperfect competition;
D O I
10.1016/j.jue.2006.03.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study the duopolistic interaction between congestible facilities that supply perfect substitutes and make sequential decisions on capacities and prices, and compare the results to monopoly and first-best outcomes. At the Nash equilibrium prices and capacities, there is more congestion in the duopoly than in the social optimum. Given our assumptions, monopoly pricing and capacity choices result in the same congestion level as the social optimum. The higher congestion level under duopoly is due to strategic price responses to capacity investments. Moreover, higher marginal costs of capacity may increase duopoly profits. Lastly, when capacity is relatively cheap or demand relatively inelastic, stable asymmetric Nash equilibria may result, where the high-capacity facility offers low time costs at a high price, and the smaller facility offers lower service levels at a lower price. In that case, there is endogenous product differentiation by ex ante identical firms. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 283
页数:20
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]  
*FAA OST, 1999, AIRP BUS PRACT THEIR
[12]  
GABSZEWICZ JJ, 1979, J ECON THEORY, V20, P340
[13]   Bundling, integration and the delivered price of air travel: are low cost carriers full service competitors? [J].
Gillen, D ;
Morrison, W .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2003, 9 (01) :15-23
[14]   QUANTITY PRECOMMITMENT AND BERTRAND COMPETITION YIELD COURNOT OUTCOMES [J].
KREPS, DM ;
SCHEINKMAN, JA .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1983, 14 (02) :326-337
[15]  
Maggi G, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P237
[16]  
Oum TH, 2004, J TRANSP ECON POLICY, V38, P217
[17]   RELAXING PRICE-COMPETITION THROUGH PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION [J].
SHAKED, A ;
SUTTON, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1982, 49 (01) :3-13
[18]  
Small K. A., 1992, URBAN TRANSPORTATION
[19]   MONOPOLY, QUALITY, AND REGULATION [J].
SPENCE, AM .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1975, 6 (02) :417-429
[20]  
Starkie D, 2001, J TRANSP ECON POLICY, V35, P119