Childhood vaccine risk/benefit communication among public health clinics: A time-motion study

被引:19
作者
Davis, TC
Fredrickson, DD
Kennen, EM
Arnold, C
Shoup, E
Sugar, M
Humiston, SG
Bocchini, JA
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat, Shreveport, LA 71130 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Wichita, KS 67214 USA
[3] Caddo Parish Hlth Unit, Shreveport, LA USA
[4] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
childhood vaccines; immunization; patient; parent education; public health; risks and benefits; vaccine communication;
D O I
10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021305.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
United States law requires that immunization providers use Centers for Disease Control Vaccine Information Statements (VISs) and inform parents about vaccine risks and benefits prior to every childhood immunization. A recent national survey found that public health clinics (PHCs) reported high compliance with this law. To further investigate these findings, we conducted an immunization time-motion study in two PHCs in Kansas and Louisiana. Research assistants observed a convenience sample of 246 child immunization visits to record distribution of the VISs and content and time of vaccine communication. Thirty percent of parents read below a ninth grade level, 53% had Medicaid insurance, and 56% were Black. VISs were given with every dose of vaccine administered in 89% of visits. Public health nurses (PHNs) frequently discussed potential vaccine side effects (91%), treatment of side effects (91%), and the vaccine schedule (93%). Contraindications were screened in 71% of visits. Benefits were discussed in 48% of visits and severe risks in 29%. The national Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was never discussed. The immunization visits lasted for a mean of 20 min. Vaccine communication of side effects, risks, benefits, screening for contraindications, and the next visit lasted for an average of 16 s for all vaccines. PHC compliance with mandated VIS distribution and practical vaccine communication was high. Room for improvement exists in discussion of benefits, serious risks, and the VICP.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 236
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Safety of vaccinations - Miss America, the media, and public health
    Freed, GL
    Katz, SL
    Clark, SJ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (23): : 1869 - 1872
  • [22] FULGINITI VA, 1984, PEDIATRICS, V74, P961
  • [23] FULGINITI VA, 1982, IMMUNIZATION CLIN PR, P29
  • [24] The risk of vaccination - The importance of "negative'' studies
    Gellin, BG
    Schaffner, W
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (05) : 372 - 373
  • [25] Do parents understand immunizations? A national telephone survey
    Gellin, BG
    Maibach, EW
    Marcuse, EK
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2000, 106 (05) : 1097 - 1102
  • [26] How much time is spent on well-child care and vaccinations?
    LeBaron, CW
    Rodewald, L
    Humiston, S
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 1999, 153 (11): : 1154 - 1159
  • [27] Vaccines under fire: The importance of perspective
    Marshall, GS
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANNALS, 2001, 30 (07): : 379 - +
  • [28] MCLAUGHLIN GH, 1969, J READING, V12, P639
  • [29] *NAT IMM PROGR, 2001, NAT IMM SURV Q3 2000
  • [30] Notes from the Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine - Vaccine risk/benefit communication project
    Page, D
    Eason, P
    Humiston, S
    Barker, W
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (02) : 176 - 177