Maximum standardized uptake values on positron emission tomography of esophageal cancer predicts stage, tumor biology, and survival

被引:87
作者
Cerfolio, Robert J.
Bryant, Ayesha S.
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. The stage of esophageal cancer is currently determined by the anatomic TNM classification system as opposed to information about tumor biology. Methods. A retrospective review was made of a prospective electronic database. Patients had esophageal cancer, dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) and maximum standardized uptake value (maxSUV) measured. Biopsies were obtained from suspicious nodal and systemic locations, and when indicated, resection with complete lymphadenectomy was performed. Results. There were 89 patients (53 men). The median maxSUV for patients with high grade dysplasia, stage I, IIa, IIb, III, and IVa esophageal cancer was 1.7, 2.9, 8.9, 7.7, 9.5, and 12, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed patients with a high maxSUV were more likely to have poorly differentiated tumors (risk ratio 1.89, p = 0.032) and advanced stage (risk ratio 2.6, p < 0.001). The maxSUV correlated better (r(2) = 0.85) than the current TNM staging system for survival (r(2) = 0.68). Receiving operator characteristics curve demonstrated a maxSUV of 6.6 to be the optimal cut-off point. The 4-year survival of patients with a maxSUV of 6.6 or less was 89%, whereas it was only 31% for those patients with values greater than 6.6 (p < 0.001). Conclusions. The maxSUV of an esophageal cancer on dedicated FDG-PET scan is an independent predictor of stage, tumor characteristics, and survival. It predicts survival better than the current TNM staging system. This information may help guide treatment strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 395
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   The maximum standardized uptake values on positron emission tomography of a non-small cell lung cancer predict stage, recurrence, and survival [J].
Cerfolio, RJ ;
Bryant, AS ;
Ohja, B ;
Bartolucci, AA .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 130 (01) :151-159
[2]   Improving the inaccuracies of clinical staging of patients with NSCLC: A prospective trial [J].
Cerfolio, RJ ;
Bryant, AS ;
Ojha, B ;
Eloubeidi, M .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 80 (04) :1207-1214
[3]   The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy [J].
Cerfolio, RJ ;
Bryant, AS ;
Ohja, B ;
Bartolucci, AA ;
Eloubeidi, MA .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 129 (06) :1232-1241
[4]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[5]  
Kato H, 2003, ANTICANCER RES, V23, P3263
[6]   A threshold method to improve standardized uptake value reproducibility [J].
Lee, JR ;
Madsen, MT ;
Bushnel, D ;
Menda, Y .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2000, 21 (07) :685-690
[7]   Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer [J].
Mountain, CF .
CHEST, 1997, 111 (06) :1710-1717
[8]  
Nabi Hani A, 2002, J Nucl Med Technol, V30, P3
[9]  
*NAT CANC I, 2003, PHYS INQ
[10]  
SASAKI R, 2005, J CLIN ONCOL, V23, P6799