Using Phylogenetic, Functional and Trait Diversity to Understand Patterns of Plant Community Productivity

被引:516
作者
Cadotte, Marc W.
Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
Tilman, David
Oakley, Todd H.
机构
[1] National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
[2] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto - Scarborough, Scarborough, ON
[3] Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
[4] Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2009年 / 4卷 / 05期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SPECIES RICHNESS; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; MODEL; MICROEVOLUTIONARY; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; SELECTION; ACCURATE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0005695
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Two decades of research showing that increasing plant diversity results in greater community productivity has been predicated on greater functional diversity allowing access to more of the total available resources. Thus, understanding phenotypic attributes that allow species to partition resources is fundamentally important to explaining diversity-productivity relationships. Methodology/Principal Findings: Here we use data from a long-term experiment ( Cedar Creek, MN) and compare the extent to which productivity is explained by seven types of community metrics of functional variation: 1) species richness, 2) variation in 10 individual traits, 3) functional group richness, 4) a distance-based measure of functional diversity, 5) a hierarchical multivariate clustering method, 6) a nonmetric multidimensional scaling approach, and 7) a phylogenetic diversity measure, summing phylogenetic branch lengths connecting community members together and may be a surrogate for ecological differences. Although most of these diversity measures provided significant explanations of variation in productivity, the presence of a nitrogen fixer and phylogenetic diversity were the two best explanatory variables. Further, a statistical model that included the presence of a nitrogen fixer, seed weight and phylogenetic diversity was a better explanation of community productivity than other models. Conclusions: Evolutionary relationships among species appear to explain patterns of grassland productivity. Further, these results reveal that functional differences among species involve a complex suite of traits and that perhaps phylogenetic relationships provide a better measure of the diversity among species that contributes to productivity than individual or small groups of traits.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [51] Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems
    Tilman, D
    Wedin, D
    Knops, J
    [J]. NATURE, 1996, 379 (6567) : 718 - 720
  • [52] Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment
    Tilman, D
    Reich, PB
    Knops, J
    Wedin, D
    Mielke, T
    Lehman, C
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5543) : 843 - 845
  • [53] Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment
    Tilman, David
    Reich, Peter B.
    Knops, Johannes M. H.
    [J]. NATURE, 2006, 441 (7093) : 629 - 632
  • [54] Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: The nature and significance of dominant and minor species
    Walker, B
    Kinzig, A
    Langridge, J
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 1999, 2 (02) : 95 - 113
  • [55] Phylogenies and community ecology
    Webb, CO
    Ackerly, DD
    McPeek, MA
    Donoghue, MJ
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 2002, 33 : 475 - 505
  • [56] A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme
    Westoby, M
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 1998, 199 (02) : 213 - 227
  • [57] Niche conservatism: Integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology
    Wiens, JJ
    Graham, CH
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2005, 36 : 519 - 539
  • [58] Functional redundancy supports biodiversity and ecosystem function in a closed and constant environment
    Wohl, DL
    Arora, S
    Gladstone, JR
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (06) : 1534 - 1540
  • [59] The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
    Wright, IJ
    Reich, PB
    Westoby, M
    Ackerly, DD
    Baruch, Z
    Bongers, F
    Cavender-Bares, J
    Chapin, T
    Cornelissen, JHC
    Diemer, M
    Flexas, J
    Garnier, E
    Groom, PK
    Gulias, J
    Hikosaka, K
    Lamont, BB
    Lee, T
    Lee, W
    Lusk, C
    Midgley, JJ
    Navas, ML
    Niinemets, Ü
    Oleksyn, J
    Osada, N
    Poorter, H
    Poot, P
    Prior, L
    Pyankov, VI
    Roumet, C
    Thomas, SC
    Tjoelker, MG
    Veneklaas, EJ
    Villar, R
    [J]. NATURE, 2004, 428 (6985) : 821 - 827
  • [60] Conventional functional classification schemes underestimate the relationship with ecosystem functioning
    Wright, JP
    Naeem, S
    Hector, A
    Lehman, C
    Reich, PB
    Schmid, B
    Tilman, D
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (02) : 111 - 120