Resolution of genotypic heterogeneity in prostate tumors using polymerase chain reaction and comparative genomic hybridization on microdissected carcinoma and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia foci

被引:20
作者
Beheshti, B
Vukovic, B
Marrano, P
Squire, JA [1 ]
Park, PC
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp, Ontario Canc Inst, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0165-4608(02)00540-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer (CaP) is a multifocal heterogenous disease, A major challenge in CaP research is to identify genetic biomarkers that herald aggressive transformation. To investigate the effect of tumor heterogeneity on the analysis of genomic aberration, we compared the results of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of DNA extracted from tumor bulk against that of DNA amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR) from homogeneous cell population obtained by laser capture microdissection of discrete tumor foci. Sampling by microdissection, aberrations were observed in three of three foci of carcinoma involved with prostatic capsule, and in two of three prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) foci examined. Carcinoma foci consistently exhibited more extensive aberrations than the PIN samples obtained from the same tumor. Within these samples, the different tumor foci exhibited gain of 8q, whereas PIN showed no consistent aberration. Using bulk extracted DNA, CGH detected aberrations in only 3 of 21 samples investigated, despite the known trisomy 8 status, as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The results of this study demonstrate that CGH analysis using bulk dissected fresh tissue is insufficiently sensitive to fully detect the chromosomal numerical aberrations in CaP. Given the considerable intratumor genomic heterogeneity, CGH with microdissection and DOP-PCR amplification provides a more complete repertoire of aberrations as well as a better phenotype-genotype correlation in prostate tumors. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
[51]  
2-Y
[52]   Microdissection, DOP-PCR, and comparative genomic hybridization of paraffin-embedded familial prostate cancers [J].
Verhagen, PCMS ;
Zhu, XL ;
Rohr, LR ;
Cannon-Albright, LA ;
Tavtigian, SV ;
Skolnick, MH ;
Brothman, AR .
CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 2000, 122 (01) :43-48
[53]  
Virgin JB, 1999, PROSTATE, V41, P49, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19990915)41:1<49::AID-PROS7>3.0.CO
[54]  
2-8
[55]  
VISAKORPI T, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, P342
[56]   Sequence-ready contig for the 1.4-cM ductal carcinoma in situ loss of heterozygosity region on chromosome 8p22-p23 [J].
Wang, JC ;
Radford, DM ;
Holt, MS ;
Helms, C ;
Goate, A ;
Brandt, W ;
Parik, M ;
Phillips, NJ ;
DeSchryver, K ;
Schuh, ME ;
Fair, KL ;
Ritter, JH ;
Marshall, P ;
Donis-Keller, H .
GENOMICS, 1999, 60 (01) :1-11
[57]  
WILTSHIRE RN, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, P3954
[58]   CYTOGENETIC EVIDENCE OF INTRATUMORAL FOCAL HETEROGENEITY IN PORSTATIC CARCINOMAS [J].
WULLICH, B ;
BREITKREUZ, T ;
ZWERGEL, T ;
UNTEREGGER, G ;
SEITZ, G ;
ZANG, KD .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1992, 48 (04) :372-377
[59]   Genetic heterogeneity in a prostatic carcinoma and associated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia as demonstrated by combined use of laser-microdissection, degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR and comparative genomic hybridization [J].
Zitzelsberger, H ;
Kulka, U ;
Lehmann, L ;
Walch, A ;
Smida, J ;
Aubele, M ;
Lörch, T ;
Höfler, H ;
Bauchinger, M ;
Werner, M .
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1998, 433 (04) :297-304