EEG differences between good and poor responders to methylphenidate in boys with the inattentive type of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

被引:25
作者
Clarke, AR [1 ]
Barry, RJ
McCarthy, R
Selikowitz, M
Croft, RJ
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Brain & Behav Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Neuropsychopharmacol, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia
关键词
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; inattention; children; electroencephalography; medication; methylphenidate;
D O I
10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00147-5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study investigated electroencephalographic (EEG) differences between good and poor responders to methylphenidate in boys with the Inattentive type of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Methods: Twenty good and 15 poor responders to methylphenidate, based on the results of a continuous performance task, and 35 age- and sex-matched control subjects, participated in this study. EEG was recorded from 21 sites during an eyes-closed resting condition and Fourier transformed to provide estimates for total power. and absolute and relative power in the delta, theta, alpha and beta bands, and for the theta/alpha and theta/beta ratios. Results: EEG differences were found between the ADHD children and controls which were compatible with previous literature on the Inattentive type. Differences were also found between the good and poor responders to methylphenidate. Conclusions: Good responders had EEG profiles that suggested that they were more cortically hypoaroused than poor responders. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1198
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
EEG POWER SPECTRA OF DYSPHONETIC AND NONDYSPHONETIC POOR READERS [J].
ACKERMAN, PT ;
DYKMAN, RA ;
OGLESBY, DM ;
NEWTON, JEO .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 49 (02) :140-152
[2]
EEG POWER SPECTRA OF CHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA, SLOW LEARNERS, AND NORMALLY READING CHILDREN WITH ADD DURING VERBAL PROCESSING [J].
ACKERMAN, PT ;
DYKMAN, RA ;
OGLESBY, DM ;
NEWTON, JEO .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 1994, 27 (10) :619-630
[3]
Andreassi J. L, 1995, Psychophysiology-Human Behavior and Physiological Response, VThird
[4]
[Anonymous], J CHILDREN CONT SOC
[5]
CALLAWAY E, 1983, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V40, P1243
[6]
Sensitivity and specificity of QEEG in children with attention deficit or specific developmental learning disorders [J].
Chabot, RJ ;
Merkin, H ;
Wood, LM ;
Davenport, TL ;
Serfontein, G .
CLINICAL ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY, 1996, 27 (01) :26-34
[7]
Quantitative electroencephalographic profiles of children with attention deficit disorder [J].
Chabot, RJ ;
Serfontein, G .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 40 (10) :951-963
[8]
EEG evidence for a new conceptualisation of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [J].
Clarke, AR ;
Barry, RJ ;
McCarthy, R ;
Selikowitz, M ;
Brown, CR .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (07) :1036-1044
[9]
EEG differences between good and poor responders to methylphenidate and dexamphetamine in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [J].
Clarke, AR ;
Barry, RJ ;
McCarthy, R ;
Selikowitz, M .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (02) :194-205
[10]
Age and sex effects in the EEG: differences in two subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [J].
Clarke, AR ;
Barry, RJ ;
McCarthy, R ;
Selikowitz, M .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (05) :815-826