Governing Fintech and Fintech as Governance: The Regulatory Sandbox, Riskwashing, and Disruptive Social Classification

被引:40
作者
Brown, Eric [1 ]
Piroska, Dora [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Int Business Sch, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Inst Econ & Publ Policy, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Cent European Univ, Dept Int Relat, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Fintech; financialization; regulation; governance; banking; sandbox;
D O I
10.1080/13563467.2021.1910645
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article evaluates the sandbox approach as a regulatory answer to the challenges financial technology brings to finance and social relations. Taking fintech as a sociotechnological phenomenon embedded in discourses of solutionism and innovation, we show that the regulatory sandbox accepts these discourses. Instead of containing fintech, the sandbox is designed in a way that advances riskwashing of fintech even if it is disguised as risktaming. Next, we demonstrate fintech's problematic nature that regulation should control. First, we propose that through its information processing capacity, fintech accelerates the transition from bank-based to market-based finance. Second, we demonstrate that fintech as part of a fintech-financialization apparatus has catallactic and value-extracting governance effects. Third, inserting the fintech-financialization apparatus into Fourcade and Healy's argument on the social stratification effect of the data-driven economy, we argue that it also has a socially disruptive potential. We critique the regulatory sandbox for being a facilitator to this process and recommend increasing the number and power of veto players and veto points in complex regulatory regimes.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 32
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Ordinalization: Lewis A. Coser Memorial Award for Theoretical Agenda Setting 2014 [J].
Fourcade, Marion .
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2016, 34 (03) :175-195
[22]  
Gabor D., 2019, Securitization for Sustainability: Does it help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals?
[23]   The digital revolution in financial inclusion: international development in the fintech era [J].
Gabor, Daniela ;
Brooks, Sally .
NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2017, 22 (04) :423-436
[24]   BANKS AND THE FALSE DICHOTOMY IN THE COMPARATIVE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF FINANCE [J].
Hardie, Iain ;
Howarth, David ;
Maxfield, Sylvia. ;
Verdun, Amy .
WORLD POLITICS, 2013, 65 (04) :691-+
[25]  
Hayek F., 1998, LAWS LEGISLATION LIB, V2
[26]  
Hayek FA, 1945, AM ECON REV, V35, P519
[27]   Algorithms, Governance, and Governmentality: On Governing Academic Writing [J].
Introna, Lucas D. .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2016, 41 (01) :17-49
[28]   Financial subordination and uneven financialization in 21st century Africa [J].
Kvangraven, Ingrid Harvold ;
Koddenbrock, Kai ;
Sylla, Ndongo Samba .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 56 (01) :119-140
[29]   Big data for (not so) small loans: technological infrastructures and the massification of fringe finance [J].
Langevin, Marie .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 26 (05) :790-814
[30]   The Performance of Liquidity in the Subprime Mortgage Crisis [J].
Langley, Paul .
NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2010, 15 (01) :71-89